Tuesday, December 02, 2025

We're all looking for who did this

 In some ways it was a new way to lose this season and in some ways it echoed previous #mubb loses but the Oklahoma loss was a tough one nonetheless. We have to chat through the results of that game but more than anything we are really using it as a context for evaluating where this season has gone wrong. We talk through expectations for the rest of the season, what we'd like to see the team do, and where changes can be made in season. We then preview Valpo and very half heartedly preview the Wisconsin game. Enjoy!

 

https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/qmbu2vm7zaxubm8k/2025_Dec_1_So_Fetch8cout.mp3

 

Monday, November 24, 2025

Fear and Anxiety is this Pods Growth Mindset

 Another week, another tough loss for #mubb. We've officially adjusted expectations so now it's time to talk about what's working (not a whole lot) and what's not (fairly extensive list). We talk through the roster and what we're seeing from players and the prospects of improvement. We also talk changes we would like to see as this season shifts from target goals to avoidance goals. We also talk about the Oklahoma game and what we can and cannot expect from that game. At least we still have each other. Enjoy!

 

 

https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/hwcckpme677w7nt9/2025_Nov_22_Down_Badapb72.mp3

 

 

Saturday, November 22, 2025

Is Marquette's Season Over?

After losing to Dayton, Chase Ross & Marquette are looking for answers

Photo by Mark Hoffman | Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel

Typically, we don't talk about the NCAA Tournament bubble until conference season is underway. I don't start bracketology articles until around Christmas. It's too early and there isn't enough data to say anything with even marginal confidence. Except sometimes, it doesn't feel like it's too early...

Is There an At-Large Path?

Marquette's early losses to Indiana, Maryland, and Dayton leave Marquette at 3-3. This matches the worst program start since the 1989-90 season, and only matched by 2014-15. For a program pushing the power of retention, losses to teams like Indiana and Maryland that are made up completely of new players -- tied for 0.0% minutes continuity per kenpom while Marquette's 53.5% is 13th nationally and #2 among high-majors -- has to feel like a blow to the heavily marketed Relationships/Growth/Victory model. The loss to Dayton was the first time Marquette lost at home to a non-Power conference school since dropping the opener to Belmont in 2015 and killed a chance at revenge for the Flyers' upset win over then-#6 (per the AP Poll) Marquette from a year ago. Suffice to say, any March glory has to feel like an uphill climb to Marquette fans.

Let's try to sprinkle some optimism in. Making the NCAA Tournament wouldn't be wholly unprecedented. Marquette did start 3-3 start under Hank Raymonds in 1979-80 and made the NCAA Tournament. Last year, Arizona started 3-3 (and sank to 4-5) before rallying in conference play to not just make the Tournament but earned a protected 4-seed. And of course, there is the Big East Tournament automatic bid, which Marquette won three years ago and a Georgetown team that also started 3-3 won five years ago.

In the interest of keeping hope alive, this is NOT an AI generated photo

Photo by Frank Franklin II | Associated Press

Today we'll look at what it will take for Marquette to reach the NCAA Tournament. For the pessimists in the crowd, this may confirm your priors. For the optimists, we will lay out the path to making the Big Dance so you know what to hope for. It might not be as impossible as it seems.

Wins Above Bubble Primer

The first thing we'll focus on is Wins Above Bubble. This was a new metric to the NCAA Team Sheet last year but it was also the single most predictive metric of inclusion and seed. In theory, for the metric to work perfectly, any positive score would be a team that makes the NCAA Tournament and any negative score would miss. The way it works is every game is assigned a value between 0.01 and 1.00. For instance, Marquette's recent game against Dayton was assigned a positive value of 0.28, so if Marquette had won, they would've gained 0.28 in WAB. Losing earned them a negative net of the opposite, so -0.72 (the difference between 0.28 and 1.00). I'm using T-Rank because it's the easiest to track, but the NCAA's official WAB mirrors the formula using NET instead of T-Rank as the additive basis. Currently, Marquette's WAB score is -1.49.

Before we dig into WAB fully, it's important to caveat that the numbers fluctuate throughout the year. For instance, the value for beating Wisconsin on the morning of Friday, November 21 was 0.67. After losing to BYU, their value changed to 0.64, meaning they provide less value if you beat them and do more damage if you lose to them. Unfortunately, this is a trend that pervades Marquette's schedule. T-Rank includes preseason expectations that influence the rankings so that a few early season outliers don't radically change a team's rank. In terms of how this influences WAB, it can be significant for teams near the top of the rankings, but becomes negligible as you move further down the rankings. For instance, the difference between the home value for Marquette beating #42 Villanova (+0.44) and #97 Xavier (0.24) is a sizeable +0.20 in WAB. The home value difference between #254 Valparaiso (+0.06) and #310 Central Michigan (+0.04) is negligible despite a nearly identical gap in rankings.

For the purposes of this article, data was pulled the afternoon of November 21st after the BYU/Wisconsin game.

WAB Non-Conference Status

Marquette hasn't done themselves any favors with their start. In the past two years, no team has earned an at-large bid with a WAB score as low as Marquette's current -1.49. It's worth noting that once game values are established, the record will be all that matters in terms of projecting the WAB score because each game is worth an equal fluctuation of 1.00. Here are the remaining values on Marquette's non-conference schedule, along with the current expected non-conference WAB scores based on the potential remaining wins and loss scenarios:

Last year, the worst non-conference WAB scores to earn at-large berths were 4-seed Arizona (-1.21), 9-seed Creighton (-0.57), 6-seed BYU (-0.40), and play-in 11-seed Xavier (-0.39). While the WAB metric has only been on the team sheet for one season, going back to 2021 there were only two teams to earn at-large bids with a non-con WAB score worse than 2025 Arizona. Those were 2023 Texas A&M (-2.29) and 2022 Rutgers (-2.33). Buzz's TAMU squad went 15-3 in the SEC, finishing second in the league. The Scarlet Knights were a controversial Last Four In selection but had seven Q1 wins to bolster their bizarre case. Using these precedents, we feel comfortable making the following statements regarding Marquette's remaining non-conference schedule:

  1. If Marquette can't beat at least one of Oklahoma, Wisconsin, or Purdue, earning an at-large bid would be unprecedented.
  2. If Marquette can get two wins against Oklahoma, Wisconsin, and Purdue, they'll at least be back in the "you're saying there's a chance" camp.
  3. If Marquette wins all of their remaining non-conference games, they will likely be on track to earn an at-large bid.
WAB Big East Projections

We went through the conference season to determine the WAB value for every conference game. Using current numbers, a perfect 20-0 season would be worth +9.17 in WAB. Every loss drops that by because you not only lose the positive win share but also are saddled with the negative loss share.

This results in the following potential league-only based on the above:


At an initial glance, this gives a somewhat rosy outlook. If these numbers maintain through the year, Marquette getting to 7-4 in non-con and 12-8 in league would seem to at least put them in the mix for an at-large bid. It would seem that the same 7-4 with a 13-7 record would make them near locks for a bid. The problem with that is the aforementioned "if these numbers maintain" because based on current results, that doesn't look likely.

Early Trends & WAB Futures

Early in the season, metrics like T-Rank use roster construction, program history, and recruiting rankings to approximate how good teams are expected to be. However it also let you sort that preseason data out and only look at a team's performance using in-season data. This early in the season, that data can be deceptive. What it does tell you is how teams have actually played compared to the expectation of how they should have played. Look at the disparity of the teams on Marquette's schedule so far:

For the sub-150 teams, these changes don't mean much. Southern, Central Michigan, Valparaiso, and Little Rock have all had pretty large swings, but the current WAB point difference between the best guarantee game of #151 Southern (+0.12) and the worst in #324 Albany (+0.04) is less than 0.1 overall, so all of those are pretty negligible moves. The negative swings for Maryland and Oklahoma, on the other hand, are significant.

The bigger issue here though is for the Big East. Once league play starts, the WAB benefits are pretty much set in stone because even though an individual team might improve their value with a few impressive wins, their in-league opponents will have similar value losses so that it balances out in the end. These numbers are even more fixed in a league with a double-round robin schedule. More than half the Big East has seen a rank decline. Further, while the most improved metric team is Butler (+31) there are four teams that individually have bigger negative offsets than the positive done by the Bulldogs.

As this data calcifies, the expectation is that Big East WAB values will go down as the in-season results get closer to the sorted data. This is particularly salient in Big East play because non-conference play is about halfway done. That means that the league data is close to being fixed. There's still some time for the Big East to turn things around, but if this is what the league is it will likely be the weakest since 2019 when the league got just three bids and none better than a 5-seed. Cheer for every Big East team because the next two weeks will go a long way to determining if the league earns 3 bids or 5.

To address this, I calculated the values of the teams in the commensurate rankings with the sorted data for Big East teams. So instead of Georgetown's score at #70 I used the WAB value for #61 Santa Clara. For Creighton, instead of using their current #31, I used UNLV at #90. The max 20-0 value changed from +9.17 to +8.23. The effective change means that Big East wins will be worth as little as 89.8% of the current expected value while Big East losses will penalize by as much as 108.7% of the current expected value. These may not be fixed values, but they give us an idea of what will be needed to earn an at-large bid.

Historically, in the past five years no team has been left out with a 2.0 or better WAB. Using these charts, that means any combination of 22+ wins before the Big East Tournament should result in an at-large bid for Marquette. Over the same span, 79.1% of teams to finish between 1.0-1.9 WAB have earned a bid, though at least one was left out each season. This means that if Marquette finishes at 21-10, like Xavier did last year (albeit with a +0.42 WAB) they will be on the bubble but with a good chance of being in. Teams finishing between 0.0-0.9 WAB earned an at-large bid 36.5% of the time. So if Marquette finishes at 20-11, they will most likely be on the outside looking in. Given the increased importance of WAB, it seems very unlikely anyone finishing with a negative WAB will earn an at-large bid.

So is Marquette's Season Over?

In short, no. If this team can rally and pull wins out of two of their remaining three big non-con games, then follow that up with a 15-5 Big East season, no matter how unlikely that combination may be, they will likely find themselves in the NCAA Tournament no matter what happens at MSG in March. If they come up short by a game in one of those regards, there's still a chance. Given the damage already done and the likelihood that the Maryland and Dayton losses will look worse in March than they do now, I tend to think 21-10 in regular season play is the floor, unless the entire bubble implodes.

While that seems to be the annual fan expectation, with the ACC, Big 10, and Big 12 all trending toward more bids than last year, there's a good chance this will be a firmer bubble than in recent seasons, meaning that Marquette might need that gaudier 22-9 record and big wins to bolster it if they want to an at-large bid. And of course, if all else fails, Patrick Ewing proved that the Big East Tournament offers hope to even the most hapless. Let's cross our fingers and hope we don't need it.

Monday, November 17, 2025

It's #mubb, it's gone from suck to blow!

Timeless Mel Brooks comedy references aside, we gotta talk about #mubb. That game SUCKED and this podcast is officially joining the worry train for the season. Narrative trauma about losing to Buzz aside, the performance in the game was flat, then good, then great, then FLAT. We talk about what we saw in the game and what the overall trend in the season is making us to worried early. We discuss potential talent gaps and where the #culture can or will take us. We then reset seasonal expectations (they are low) and look at the week ahead. Unlike the game Saturday, we hope the podcast is something you can ENJOY!

 

 

https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/g6ivsjibmw4degkh/2025_Nov_16_We_SUCKbrhvi.mp3

 

 

Monday, November 10, 2025

That sucked

Well, the start to the new #mubb season could have been worse, but not by much. Yeah sure, they won the buy games comfortably and had some fun along the way but the focus of the latest pod is the beat down in Chicago. Marquette had an early season challenge in facing a relatively unknown Indiana team, and to say they did not meet it is an understatement. We break down the game, what we think went wrong, and what of it is fixable. We also agree to mention the p word just this once and then we are never going to mention portal again this season. We do talk about positives, who/what do we like so far this season before turning to the week ahead. A critical buy game to get right and start fixing some of the issues, especially on defense before the only true big game on the non-conference home slate, Maryland. We break down the Maryland team, the Buzz of it all, and whether this becomes an early "must win". Tough start to the season, but we still hope you enjoy!

 

  

https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/m59exj9y34d8c2zr/2025_Nov_9_IU_ouch9kw8l.mp3

 

Thursday, October 30, 2025

Buckle Up Buckaroos

Well, our long national nightmare is almost over. #mubb season is almost back so that means Scrambled Eggs is back! Hope you are really locked in because we have a lot of ground to cover. We start with a general roster overview and the players we are excited or intrigued by including a new crush now that the Jopwagon has exhausted eligibility. We then talk about the team overall and how we project it's offense and defense to perform. As is tradition, we wrap up with a game by game projection that doubles as game previews for the 3! games we have coming next week. It's a lot, but as always enjoy!

 

 

https://scrambledeggs.podbean.com/e/buckle-up-buckaroos/

 

Wednesday, October 29, 2025

Connecticut Preview, 2025-26

Connecticut Huskies

Sunday, January 4th at Gampel Pavilion, Storrs, CT / Saturday, March 7th at Fiserv Forum (Senior Day)

Head Coach: Dan Hurley (316-174 overall, 165-69 at Connecticut)

Three-Year NET Average: 13.3

Three-Year kenpom Average: 11.3

Projected 2025-26 T-Rank: 10


Solo Ball's 25 points spoiled National Marquette Day

Photo by Morry Gash | AP Photo

State of the Program

After two straight National Championships, it seemed like Dan Hurley had built an unstoppable juggernaut in Storrs. Instead the Huskies stumbled out of the gate, losing three games in Maui. Those three losses in November matched their total loss count from the season before. UConn was still competitive, going 24-11 (14-6) and finishing third in the league, but considering the two preceding years, an 8-seed and second round exit (albeit after a narrow loss to eventual National Champs Florida) had to feel like a disappointment. But instead of regressing, UConn has reinforced their roster with a mix of transfer additions and high school talent. They'll be right back in the mix at the top of the Big East again.

Rotation

The biggest name transfer is Georgia guard Silas Demary. He can play on or off the ball and offers more defensive length on the perimeter than last year's team had. Demary is also adept at creating turnovers and turning those into points the other way. The name everyone should be focused on is Solo Ball. He stepped into a regular starting role and while his minutes jumped up (11.5 mpg to 31.7) it was his per 40 numbers that really improved. In terms of counting stats/40, his points went from 11.5 to 18.2, rebounds from 3.5 to 4.5, and assists from 0.9 to 2.1. Ball didn't just play more, he played more efficiently at a higher and more productive usage. Defensively, he's only average, but should be easier to hide alongside Demary. If Ball can take another step forward in terms of usage, he will be one of the best players in the Big East, if not the entire country. Braylon Mullins steps into the elite freshman role previously occupied by Liam McNeeley and Stephon Castle. He's an elite shooter and scorer, but will surprise fans with his quickness and athleticism. An injury is expected to sideline him until early December. Jaylin Stewart is a competent deputy but this may impact their depth early in the season. Up front the senior statesman is Alex Karaban, who was a staple on UConn's most recent title teams. His scoring efficiency took a hit as more was expected from him. Expect Karaban to return to being more of a role-player with guys like Demary and Mullins alongside him as well as a larger role for Tarris Reed. This should suit Karaban well, as he's an elite role-player. Speaking of Reed, he blossomed in Hurley's system. He lived at the rim but the additional space increased his efficiency. He was an elite rebounder on both ends of the court, and being able to stay at the rim on both ends led to career bests in offensive rebounding rate, defensive rebounding rate, and block percent. He truly shone on the defensive end and while he might not be the high flyer Samson Johnson was, UConn was 7.0 points better/100 possessions defensively when he was on the court. If he can maintain his increased effectiveness while picking up more minutes, he could be in the All-American conversation next to Ball. Malachi Smith from Dayton is one to watch. He was an elite distributor for the Flyers and offensively fits well in Hurley's system, but his size may be difficult to hide on the wing, particularly if he's out there with Ball. UConn has a mix of experience (Alec Millender from IU Indy) and athleticism (Jaylin Stewart) on the bench, but the guy who might be most important there is freshman Eric Reibe. UConn has effectively used a two-big rotation the past three years and who shares minutes with Reed will be key. The hope will be that he can play with reckless abandon for 10-15 minutes per night, serving as a complement to Reed similar to how freshman Donovan Clingan was a change of pace for Adama Sanogo on the 2023 team.

Style of Play

UConn's offense is known for running a ton of sets. It's deep, complex, and firmly structured. They like to play a lot through the middle. Last year they were in the 70th percentile or higher in percentage of post up, inside out, pick and pop, and big man cut/roll plays in the country. The problem UConn's offense ran into was they while they've never been a drive heavy team, their past drives succeeded in finding shooters at the arc. Last year, their shooting tailed off a bit and Hassan Diarra, while a fine reserve, was unable to create shots for himself the way Tristen Newton did. Because he was less of an individual threat and because the shooters weren't as accurate, the offensive efficiency dropped. That said, UConn still ranked #15 in offensive efficiency, which is excellent. It just wasn't elite like the #1 and #3 rankings of the two previous seasons. Offensively, the question will be how long it takes Demary and Smith to catch up to the system. In 2022-23, UConn was a good team that became elite as Tristen Newton turned the corner from game manager to offensive maestro. In 2023-24, Newton's mastery of the playbook led to season-long dominance. The Demary/Smith combo should provide better long range accuracy at the point than Diarra gave, and returning Karaban to more of a catch and shoot role rather than secondary creator should pay offensive dividends. Their offense may be a work in progress in November, but expect big things by the end of the season.

Shot charts from CBBAnalytics.com | Defensive Ranks from kenpom.com

Defense is where UConn really fell off. After ranking in the top-7 both of the championship years, the Huskies were just 75th nationally per kenpom. Breaking down the four factors, it's pretty clear that opponent three-point accuracy was the change. They had suffered poor turnovers and free throw rates before, their offensive rebounding and rim protection was on par with the title years, and they didn't allow significantly more shots from beyond the arc relative to the previous seasons. They did allow teams to make 40+% from deep far more often and struggled to win those games. Defensive three-point accuracy is often considered to be a function of luck, so some of UConn's 2025 backslide may have been bad fortune, but Hurley's teams had ranked in the top-100 of 3PFG% defense in 8 of the past 11 seasons going back to his time at Rhode Island. Five of those teams ranked in the top-40. When it came to challenging shots, UConn simply didn't have the length and athleticism on the perimeter that they had in recent years. Looking at the defensive shot charts from the last three years (above) UConn was dominant in the paint but their arc defense is a major shift. In 2023 and 2024, teams struggled to find good looks at the arc, but the heat map improves significantly in 2025.

Strategically, expect UConn to continue chasing teams off the three-point line and forcing them inside to Reed and Reibe. While opponent accuracy from three can sway things as it did last year, the strategy of limiting threes and denying at the rim has been brutally effective, even last year. Again, the problem wasn't the number of threes or the rim defense, it was almost exclusively how accurate teams were from deep that led to the defensive regression. Reed emerging as a defensive force should help. UConn was 11-2 in games where he played more than 20 minutes and that should be the case more often than not in 2025-26.

2025-26 Outlook 

This roster fits together incredibly well. Demary and Smith provide an excellent 1-2 point guard punch and will have the ability to play together in stretches. Ball will have less defensive pressure on his plate thanks to Demary which will allow him to just be a flamethrower. Last year, it also felt like too much pressure was put on Liam McNeeley to score for UConn. Braylon Mullins is a similarly competent scorer but won't have so much pressure on him to deliver with the talent around him and on the bench behind him. The departure of Samson Johnson is also likely addition by subtraction because it will lead to more minutes for Tarris Reed, who is simply a better player. This team may not reach the heights that Hurley's best teams did, but while we had questions about last year's roster, this year Hurley has answered all of those questions emphatically. Newcomers at the point may lead to a slower start than the Huskies had in their recent championship years, but there are enough options there that it seems likely Hurley will be able to figure that out by February, by which time UConn will be a Big East and National Title threat once again.

One Man's Opinion

This team is reminiscent of Hurley's first title-winning team, and on a tier of their own as our pick to finish #1 in the Big East. Ball and Reed are the returning studs like Jordan Hawkins and Adama Sanogo. Demary and Smith are the newcomers who offer two different point guard looks like Tristen Newton and Hassan Diarra. And Alex Karaban is Alex Karaban, only older. Whether this team reaches those heights remains to be seen. A lot has to come together for any team to make a deep March run. In terms of the Big East, however, I feel they are on a tier of their own and the clear favorites in the league. St. John's may be ranked similarly in the preseason but their roster flaws are too glaring to put them on UConn's level. Marquette and Creighton both are great on one side of the ball but need to prove they are effective on both ends of the court. For the time being, the safe assumption is that the road to the Big East crown runs through Storrs.

Tuesday, October 28, 2025

Marquette Preview, 2025-26

Marquette Golden Eagles

Monday, April 6th, 2026 at Lucas Oil Stadium, Indianapolis, IN

Head Coach: Shaka Smart (370-183 overall, 98-41 at Marquette)

Three-Year NET Average: 18.3

Three-Year kenpom Average: 17.3

Projected 2025-26 T-Rank: 53

Chase Ross is ready to step from starter to star

Photo by Larry Radloff | Getty Images

State of the Program

This is really the question, isn't it? Marquette is the only high-major that is sticking with a full retain and develop model. Shaka Smart has a roster full of guys that came to Marquette from high school and have spent their entire careers in blue and gold. It has provided a steady program floor as Marquette has earned single-digit NCAA seeds in four straight years for the first time since the 2007-2010 Tournaments. It has also provided high ceilings as Smart took Marquette to the two highest seeds in program history, earning 2-seeds in 2023 and 2024. But now, the stars of those teams are gone. Olivier-Maxence Prosper, Tyler Kolek, Oso Ighodaro, and Kam Jones are in the NBA while Stevie Mitchell and David Joplin have also matriculated. The outside consensus is that Marquette has a high enough floor to compete for NCAA bids even in down years and a high enough ceiling to compete on the national stage in up years, but is eschewing the transfer portal completely something that will prevent Marquette from breaking through at that highest level to reach a Final Four and achieve more than just an appearance when they get there?

Rotation

Sean Jones: Casual fans may have forgotten Jones is part of this team after a torn ACL in January 2024 derailed his career for 22 months by the time he returns to the court. On his radio show last year, Smart made mention that Jones was ready to go as early as January but ultimately the decision was made to sit out the season so he wouldn't lose a year of eligibility. That has given Jones close to a full year to hone his game post-rehab ahead of this upcoming season. In terms of shot selection, he's Marquette's dream, having taken 41.7% of his shots from three, 7.7% in the midrange, and 50.6% at the rim. While he hasn't been an elite shooter, he has a tendency to hit big shots. His three against Illinois pushed the lead to 57-52 and Illinois would never get back to even, his three against UCLA in Maui put Marquette ahead 71-69 and proved to be the winner, and his back-to-back threes against Creighton turned a 48-46 deficit into a 52-48 lead and Creighton would never again tie the game. Jones has been a fine secondary distributor, but needs to take a step up in that regard (20.4% assist rate in 2024). On the defensive end, Jones has quick hands and excels generating turnovers, but his diminutive size puts him at a disadvantage in the half-court against longer players.

Chase Ross: Ever since his freshman year, Chase Ross has flashed the kind of burst and athleticism that NBA scouts are searching for. While the raw physical ability, the shooting range, the ability to play above the rim, and the defensive instincts have always been there, the consistency has not. While Marquette's struggles last year were largely attributed to the success of Kam Jones, Ross may have been the bellwether for the team. When Ross had a 100+ Adjusted Offensive Rating, Marquette was 20-3. When he was below 100, Marquette was just 3-8. Chase will certainly step into the leadership vacuum, but his history suggests that may be more emotional than in terms of carrying the scoring load. Ross has never taken more than 15.7% of the shots when on the court, while Jones, Parham, and Gold have all had averages of 19.8% or higher. Marquette will hope for a defensive linchpin and steadying presence from Ross, but he likely will be more of an efficient scorer than a high-volume one.

Zaide Lowery: In mid-January, it was like a light came on for Zaide Lowery. Through 18 games, he was playing 13.6 minutes per game and never got off the bench in three of them. In the last 16 games, Lowery averaged 17.8 minutes and redefined his role off the bench as a hyper-efficient scorer and reliable defensive stopper.

Because of this improvement Zaide seems likely to claim a starting spot on this year's team. Alongside Jones and Ross, he gives Marquette an active defensive perimeter capable of turning an opponent possession into points going the other way at a moment's notice. Cracked Sidewalks was told that Lowery was one of the two most impressive Marquette players in their scrimmage win over Missouri, giving us one small data point to support an expanded role.

Royce Parham: In Shaka Smart's first year at Marquette, he took a power forward that was Marquette's highest usage returning player and turned Justin Lewis into an all-league player en route to the NCAA Tournament. This year, with another roster fans aren't as familiar with, the power forward that is Marquette's highest usage returning player is Parham, who was a more efficient scorer than freshman Lewis and shot higher from two, three, and the free throw line. Parham isn't the bully-ball player Lewis was, but he's a better fit for Nevada Smith's offense and is poised for a major freshman-to-sophomore leap. Parham needs to get stronger to battle on the boards, but Smart has a long history of turning rotational wing/forward freshmen into productive sophomores.


The above looks at wing/forward players that played 30-50% of minutes as freshmen under Smart. By and large, these players improved their efficiency, usage, shooting, and rebounding numbers. In terms of counting stats, on average scoring increased 89.4% and rebounding by 55.8%. The clear outlier is Jericho Sims, though his sophomore year included the unexpected freshman one-and-done star Jaxson Hayes cutting into his opportunity. Expect a big jump from Parham, who had the second highest Offensive Rating (Alie-Cox) and third highest usage (Graham, Lewis), which could augur a jump on par with those two.

Ben Gold: Perhaps no player will draw more divided opinions on this roster than Gold. He's increased his minutes, offensive efficiency, and three-point percentage (71.9% of his career shots are outside the arc) every year at Marquette. However, he's seen his usage decline each year, hasn't developed much as a rim protector or rebounder. His struggles with bruising centers like Zuby Ejiofor and Tarris Reed have drawn fan ire. On offense, Gold is one of the best pick-and-pop players in the country but those long range shots come at the cost of not being inside to hit the boards and not being as efficient on the interior as his predecessor, Oso Ighodaro, was. Defensively, Marquette was 5.9 adjusted points/100 possessions better with Gold on the floor, but was that a function of his defense or a lack of defensive acumen in the post from Parham and Caedin Hamilton?

Ultimately, Gold is a perfectly adequate fifth starter, with pros and cons to his game. On offense, while Marquette doesn't rebound as well with him on the floor, the improved shooting both at the rim and from three more than offsets those negatives and Marquette is more efficient on the whole with him in the game. On defense, while Marquette gives up more at the rim with him in the game, the overall eFG% and defensive rating is better with Ben because of his ability to guard inside/out. Defensively, Marquette doesn't rebound well regardless, but last year Marquette's offensive and defensive rebounding rates were the best ranks of Shaka's short tenure at Marquette so it's hard to put all that on Ben. The hope will be for more consistency and a bit of a tougher defensive edge, especially against physically imposing bigs like Ejiofor, Reed, and Oswin Erhunmwunse.

The Bench: Marquette has exciting depth, but it's largely unproven. Tre Norman is the one known commodity. While he's a solid defender, he's never put together an efficient offensive game and saw his minutes cut down the stretch last year, which opens the door to other contributors. All summer long, we've heard about how Nigel James and Adrien Stevens will be ready to contribute from day one. That said, freshmen stealing minutes from experienced players is a tale as old as time. The hope will be that James can be an able complement to Jones. He has a reputation as a tenacious defender with a developing offensive game that can get downhill or connect from range. Stevens has drawn comparisons to recently graduated Stevie Mitchell because of his defensive acumen and quick hands (cue the Stevens "Mitchell") nickname. However all of that potential will sound familiar after Damarius Owens never really lived up to last year's hype. He provides wing depth and has flashed offensive explosiveness if he can cut down on the turnovers. Up front, Caedin Hamilton and Josh Clark add additional depth in the front court. Unless...

Marquette's Fetch Hamilton, because the staff is trying to make him happen

Photo from @marquette.basketball | Instagram

In the movie Mean Girls, teenager Gretchen Wieners continually refers to things as being "Fetch," which is her personal word for something that's cool. Throughout the movie she uses the term despite it not catching on with anyone else. Finally, her classmate Regina George says "stop trying to make Fetch happen, it's not going to happen." Last year, the Marquette staff talked up Caedin Hamilton as someone who would have a major rotation role, but like Fetch, that never happened. So far this year, the public facing information is that Hamilton was Marquette's best player in each of the first three weeks of practice and Smart has talked about him frequently as the most improved player and one of the first names he discussed at Big East Media Day. Cracked Sidewalks was told that Hamilton was one of the two best players in the Missouri scrimmage win. Preseason hype often fails to match up with results, but if Hamilton is a starting-level Big East center, that would allow Ben Gold to play a more natural power forward role that will let him use his length as a perimeter defender, help-side shot blocker, and diminish his need to be in the paint. It would also likely push Royce Parham to the bench, meaning his breakout could come in the form of a Big East Sixth Man of the Year contender who can effectively back up 2-5 similar to what David Joplin did as a sophomore. Hamilton's play last year certainly wouldn't traditionally augur a Big East breakout, but if he's ready to make Fetch happen, it would significantly raise the ceiling for this team.

Style of Play

Marquette's offense starts on the defensive end where the team is elite at creating turnovers and scoring in transition. Once in the half-court, Marquette shifted a bit away from pick and roll offense last year, especially in terms of the big men. Replacing Oso Ighodaro with a pick-and-pop big like Ben Gold will do that. They will continue to prioritize getting shots beyond the arc or at the rim; Marquette's 15.0% midrange rate was #342 nationally. Expect this team to get downhill more, which starts with Sean Jones. He's taken more than 50% of his shots at the rim both seasons and is better at drawing and playing through contact than either Tyler Kolek or Kam Jones were. Thus far he hasn't been the creator those two were which likely means that's been a priority for DeAndre Haynes in Jones' rehabilitation.

What will really be different about this offense, however, will be the pace. While Marquette has been in the top-25 of offensive possession length all four years under Smart, that was with some players like Tyler Kolek, Kam Jones, and Stevie Mitchell who were not possessed of blistering footspeed. That's not the case with this team. Sean Jones is one of the fastest end-to-end players in the country. Ross and Lowery are both able to get up court quickly. Nigel James may rival Jones' speed. Now that we finally have a roster full of players Shaka recruited out of high school, I expect we will see what may be the fastest offense in the country, and almost certainly top-10 at worst. While there could be some correlation rather than causation here, look at the adjusted offensive ranks of high major teams that finished top-25 in average possession length on offense, with percent of shots taken in midrange mixed in for fun:


What we see here is that out of the 24 high-major teams to play at an APL ranked in the top-25 over the last 4 years, 9 finished with a top-10 offense (37.5%), 15 finished with a top-25 offense (62.5%), and 20 finished with a top-50 offense (83.3%). Only four finished outside the top-20, and all of them took more than 20% of their shots in the midrange. The hypothesis is simple. If you play at a high offensive tempo, you will get opportunities before the offense is set, and if your teams are well-schooled to take good shots, that will result in a high-level offense. This has been a successful formula through sub-100 eFG% rankings (2022 Alabama, 2025 Marquette), sub-200 turnover rates (2022 & 2023 Alabama, 2023 Arizona), sub-100 offensive rebounding rates (2022 Gonzaga, 2023 & 2024 Marquette), and sub-300 free throw rates (2023-25 Marquette). Knowing that Marquette is almost certainly going to take fewer than 20% of their shots in midrange (15.0% or lower each of the past three years), Marquette's offensive floor is likely still in the top-50, with a top-25 offense more likely than a sub-50 offense.

Defensively, while there are principles of Shaka's chaos-inducing Havoc defense from his VCU days, his success at Marquette is with an even more insidious defensive philosophy. To illustrate this, we're going to focus on three stats that most people see as superfluous but help explain why it's such an effective defense.


We start with defensive possession length. The focus here starts with Marquette's 3/4 court press. The goal isn't just to force half-court violations but to force 8-10 seconds off the shot clock before the offense can get into their sets. This means that if the offense is able to get into their half-court offense, they already have less time than they are accustomed to. Next we look at the percent of opponent shots assisted. On its own this only tells us that successful offensive possessions against Marquette are most likely to come from ball movement. However the counter to this is that it's hard to score one-on-one against Marquette's defense. If you want to find success, you have to move the ball, probe the defense, and actively create a good look. Third, we go to one of Shaka's hallmarks, turnover rate. Marquette has forged an elite defense in terms of turnover rate which immediately cuts offensive efficiency on that possession to zero and opens up offensive transition opportunities where Marquette has been in the 86th or better percentile each of the past three years. When taken together, Marquette's defense forces long possessions that need to move the ball to succeed. And every second that ticks off the clock, every extra pass that has to be made to create a good look, those are all one more opportunity for Marquette's defense to turn opponents over. This is how Marquette's last three seasons have featured their three best defensive ranks in at kenpom since Jae Crowder was winning BEPOY despite ranking outside the top-100 in eFG% and outside the top-200 in Offensive Rebounding rate all of those years.

Marquette's biggest weakness is on the interior. The Golden Eagles were #247 in defensive rebound rate (31.0%) and #201 in 2PFG% at the rim (57.9%). The at the rim number is particularly concerning because when Royce Parham and Ben Gold were on the court together, it ballooned to 66.7%. Hopefully a full offseason of growth and playing together will get them better acclimated to covering each other's deficiencies and serving as help-side shot-blockers when the perimeter breaks down. If not, that turnover rate will need to improve if Marquette has any hopes of maintaining a top-30 defense.

2025-26 Outlook 

It feels like the vibe around this season is that Marquette will be down this year. I think that's premature. First and foremost, this defense has real potential to again be excellent. I hesitate to think they can be a top-10 defense without better rim protection, but the perimeter defense and turnover capability will be excellent. This should be a top-20 defense with any semblance of rim protection raising that ceiling.

The pundit and fan focus is on what Marquette lost. Kam Jones, Stevie Mitchell, and David Joplin were some of the winningest players in program history. But are their losses more significant than Justin Lewis, Darryl Morsell, Kur Kuath, and Greg Elliott in 2022? In terms of raw scoring, the 2022 team lost 56.1% of their scoring and the 2025 team lost 57.9%, a very similar total. In the past 28 years, Marquette and Shaka have had 13 combined seasons when they lost between 40-60% of their volume scoring. In 6 instances the next year's offense was worse, in 7 instances the next year's offense was better. As we said in 2022, losing volume scoring is not a major concern.

What's more important offensively is what we pointed out above. Marquette has consistently developed players with elite offensive efficiency, like Tyler Kolek, O-Max Prosper, Oso Ighodaro, and Kam Jones. Chase Ross, Ben Gold, and Zaide Lowery have already demonstrated similar growth so why should fans not expect Sean Jones, Royce Parham, and Damarius Owens to follow suit given the opportunity? This team is going to attack quickly, get shots before the defense is set, and we know they'll take quality shots because all of these guys have spent their entire college careers in a system that drills that and is designed to create those looks. I firmly believe we saw Marquette's offensive floor in 2022 because that team of Wojo leftovers and transfers were too conditioned to take midrange shots. Nevada Smith will have this offense in the top-50 and most likely significantly higher than that. Last year's team struggled on offense when Kam Jones and David Joplin weren't making shots but everyone still relied on them to be the primary options. I fully believe when forced into the deep end, the players who know this system and are given the confidence to execute will do just that. 

One Man's Opinion

Picking Marquette #2 in the Big East might just seem like fan bias, but it's as much about the rest of the Big East as it is about Marquette. There's a clear Tier 1 in the Big East and now that we're this high in the previews we can say UConn stands alone. Tier 2 is St. John's, Creighton, and Marquette. We covered the St. John's roster deficiencies. In 20 of the past 21 seasons, at least one preseason top-10 team has finished the season unranked and if I were betting on any of this year's top-10, St. John's would top that list. That leaves Creighton and Marquette, who are like a reverse Spider-Man meme. Creighton should have a great offense with questions on defense while Marquette has a great defense with questions on offense. If both of the trusted units are top-20 nationally, the question is whether Creighton's defense or Marquette's offense will be better. Given the track records, I have less faith in McDermott having a top-50 defense than I do Smart and Smith piecing together a top-50 offense. It's by a narrow margin, but Marquette gets the edge over both St. John's and Creighton.

Monday, October 27, 2025

Creighton Preview, 2025-26

Creighton Blue Jays

Saturday, December 20th, 2025 at CHI Health Center, Omaha, NE / Tuesday, January 27th, 2026 at Fiserv Forum

Head Coach: Greg McDermott (630-366 overall, 350-171 at Creighton)

Three-Year NET Average: 21.7

Three-Year kenpom Average: 19.3

Projected 2025-26 T-Rank: 23

Jackson McAndrew leads a new-look Blue Jays squad

Photo by IMAGN

State of the Program

Greg McDermott passed Dana Altman as the winningest coach in Creighton history last year. Creighton's fifth straight NCAA Tournament bid matched a program best originally set from 1999-2003. In his 15 seasons, McDermott has as many Sweet 16 and Elite 8 appearances as Creighton did in its entire history before he arrived. It's safe to say the state of Creighton's program has never been stronger, even in a bit of a rebuilding year. The question is if that will sustain beyond McDermott's tenure, as he brought in former Creighton assistant and High Point head coach Alan Huss to be the coach in waiting. But how Creighton fares in the post-McDermott world is a question for another day.


Rotation

The offensive keys will likely be in the hands of Nik Graves. The Charlotte transfer is a downhill, driving guard that uses his 6'3" frame to get in the lane and draw contact. He protects the ball well and is a capable but not spectacular distributor. Josh Dix from Iowa is a gifted three-level scorer who will love the offensive freedom of McDermott's system. Blake Harper was the MEAC Player of the Year as a freshman. He's a high-volume scorer who is efficient outside the arc and ranked top-40 at both fouls drawn/40 minutes and free throw rate. The Big East is a big step up, but he's shown the ability to post high-level productivity. Jackson McAndrew is the most prominent returning player and could be in for a big step up in production. He is the second-highest rated freshman in Creighton history and showed he belonged last year. His size, shooting, and savvy play makes him an ideal fit for McDermott's system. Owen Freeman is another Iowa transplant and arguably the biggest transfer name in Creighton's haul. He's a monster at the rim, taking 73.8% of his shots there and converting 70.3% of them. Freeman is also a force rebounding on both ends of the court and the best shot-blocker the Jays have. The biggest question is an injury setback that may not have him ready for the start of the season. Creighton may have a number of new pieces, but they are reinforced with experience. Fedor Zugic took time settling in but the European transplant improved as the season went on. Hudson Greer overtook McAndrew as the highest rated recruit in Creighton history and should be an immediate contributor. Jasen Green and Isaac Traudt both have starting experience in the system and add size and depth.

Style of Play

McDermott runs an offense where players are in constant motion, working for an open shooting look. They spread teams out, creating space with shooters and running off constant screens to create open shots and rim running cuts. When they drive or post up, it's usually the off-ball players you should watch because the ball-handler is likely looking to spray it out to the perimeter for an open three. While there's typically a lead ball handler, Creighton tends to have 2-3 players capable of creating shots for others and will usually have four or five legit three point threats surrounding (or including) a big man. McDermott's bigs usually develop into long-range threats (if at lower frequency) so don't be surprised to see Freeman step out as well. When he does, it will likely be off a pick-and-pop, though the bigs are equally effective rolling to the rim off a pick. And while they don't create offense through turnovers, they do love to run in transition. Creighton will attack off makes or defensive rebounds if the opportunity presents itself.

Creighton killed teams inside and should be better from three

Shot chart from CBBAnalytics.com | Range Percentages from Hoop-explorer.com

Creighton has played a lot of drop coverage in recent years. This was because Ryan Kalkbrenner excelled in this, using his length to be a disruptive mismatch on the perimeter then fading back to the rim to block shots and protect the paint. While Kalkbrenner developed into a respectable rebounder, Creighton rebounds as a team and mitigates the risks of drop with collective effort. The Jays are well schooled to defend without fouling (top-4 nationally in free throw rate each of the past four years) and chase teams off the three point line. However, that was all with four-time Big East Defensive Player of the Year Kalkbrenner as the defensive backbone. The five best defensive ranks for Creighton under Greg McDermott all came with Kalkbrenner. His average defensive rating before that was 98.2. The four transfers projected to play on this team all come from teams that were sub-160 defenses last year. As good as Creighton will be on offense, there's a good chance they are just as bad on defense.

2025-26 Outlook 

The Jays will be a tale of two ends of the court. Offensively, they will be lethal. Defensively, they will likely be a sieve. Creighton will try to turn every game into a shooting contest, and while they'd likely beat most teams in an empty gym, they will struggle with teams that can chase them off the three-point line and have the physicality and quickness to disrupt their offensive flow. I don't really see them stopping much of anyone. As far as who they brought in, defense is a massive problem. Graves was a mediocre defender in the American. Harper was a bad defender in the MEAC. At Iowa, three of (notoriously poor defensive coach) Fran McCaffrey's worse five defenses were the past three years, which coincide with three years of Josh Dix and two of Owen Freeman. These teams remind me a lot of Creighton's teams when they first entered the Big East. Elite shooting, but unable to stop anyone. That should be good enough for a top-half league finish and at-large bid, but they don't look complete enough for a deep run in March.

One Man's Opinion

Creighton checks in at #3 in the Big East. This team should have a top-20 offense, but in his 14 pre-Kalkbrenner high-major seasons, McDermott's average kenpom defense ranked 89.4 with zero top-45 finishes and four sub-120 finishes. This roster certainly doesn't look like it will be at the high end of those averages. Creighton can get hot enough to beat anyone on a given night, but they don't have the defense to stop anyone that can slow their attack enough to keep up on the scoreboard. Ultimately, their placement here comes down to trust. I trust their offense more than I trust St. John's on either end of the court. But in a league where Creighton's offense and Marquette's defense should both be high level, I trust Marquette more on the offensive end thanks to Nevada Smith's system than I do Creighton on the defensive end thanks to McDermott's history without Kalkbrenner. Expect them to be wearing home whites in the first round of the NCAA Tournament but lacking the two-way quality to challenge for a Big East title or deep tourney run.

Thursday, October 23, 2025

St. John's Preview, 2025-26

St. John's Red Storm

Tuesday, January 13th, 2026 at Madison Square Garden, New York, NY / Wednesday, February 18, 2026 at Fiserv Forum

Head Coach: Rick Pitino (761-308 overall, 51-18 at St. John's)

Three-Year NET Average: 47.7

Three-Year kenpom Average: 39.0

Projected 2025-26 T-Rank: 8

Zuby Ejiofor averaged 21.0 ppg/11.3 rpg against Marquette

Photo by Patrick McDermott | Getty Images

State of the Program

Rick Pitino's second year at St. John's took the Big East by storm. After a solid but unspectacular non-con in which they lost a pair of close games to NCAA teams Baylor and Georgia, the Johnnies went 18-2 in league play and won the Big East Tournament, matching UConn's record 21 total Big East victories from a season before. St. John's also won their first NCAA Tournament game since 2000. The only returning player of significance back is Big East Player of the Year favorite Zuby Ejiofor, but he's surrounded by a loaded transfer class that has some pundits ranking them as high as #1 in the nation going into 2025-26. It didn't take long for Rick Pitino to reestablish St. John's reputation as a national power.

Rotation

The transfer haul starts with an remade backcourt. Ian Jackson and Oziyah Sellers are both high efficiency scoring guards that do their best work beyond the arc. Joson Sanon is another shooter who turned up his scoring down the stretch for Arizona State, averaging 18.8 ppg over his last five. The problem is that all three are poor defenders. Up front, the most interesting minutes battle might be between Dillon Mitchell and Bryce Hopkins. Mitchell is a lockdown defender that can block shots, generate turnovers, and clean the glass but is a high-efficiency, low-usage offensive player that needs to be near the rim to be effective. Hopkins has had mixed results on defense with less range and lateral quickness, but is better on the offensive end where he is a monster inside and capable of getting his own shot, especially off the offensive glass. Zuby Ejiofor will likely be leading the All-American and Big East Player of the Year lists. The big man was a two-way menace last year, using his physicality to rough up opponents on defense and playing like a high-efficiency bull in the China shop on offense where he is a great at-the-rim scorer. The key to this team might be Dylan Darling. The Big Sky Player of the Year seemed to be a recruiting afterthought when St. John's missed out on some targets but he's the only true point guard on the roster. On a team loaded with offensive options, someone has to get them the ball so don't be surprised if Darling plays a bigger role. The rest of the bench is promising but unproven. Sophomore Lefteris Liotopoulous and freshman Kelvin Odih provide wing options while Ruben Prey will be counted on to step up from deep reserve to primary backup for Ejiofor.

Style of Play

Rick Pitino has shifted his offensive philosophy from dribble-drive to getting more action out of cuts. His teams have taken a lot of mid-range the last two years and rely on the bigs to clean up misses and get putbacks. The Red Storm cut against modern basketball tendencies, ranking near the bottom of the nation in three-point rate (341st) and percentage (340th). Expect that to change next year. Pitino brought in perimeter threats with an eye on not being knocked out of the NCAA Tournament while shooting 2/22 from three again like last year. But who is going to create those shots?

The chart below shows assist rates as well as the percentage of shots each potential St. John's rotation player took by range (three-point, mid-range, at the rim) and how often those made field goals were assisted. The only player on the roster that was able to both create shots for others and get shots for himself was Dylan Darling, who did that against Big Sky competition and isn't expected to start. To read the chart, in assist rate, green is good, red is varying degrees of bad. In the shot rates, blue indicates a player is unlikely to take shots in that area and orange indicates they take shots there frequently. In assisted rates, blue indicates the player cannot get that shot on his own and orange indicates they are able to create their own shot.

Data from kenpom.com and Hoop-Explorer.com

Assist rate in and of itself is not one of the most important factors in offensive efficiency. That said, this team will likely be forced into one-on-one situations on offense regularly. When players tasked to create for themselves struggle to get clean looks from three and can't get to the rim, they tend to settle for mid-range shots. St. John's will need to hope they have tough shot makers because that's what many of their looks are likely to be. The best chance for efficient offense will be by hitting the offensive glass, where they do have numerous strong options. The roster makeup indicates an offense similar to Buzz Williams' Texas A&M squads with less effective ball movement. I'm skeptical of this offense for two reasons. First, as the chart above indicates, historically these are guys that need others to create shots for them to succeed. Second, over the past two years St. John's has taken a ton of mid-range shots. If these guys can't get their own shots and settle for bad shots, that's how you end up ranked #68 nationally in offense (2025 kenpom rank).

Defensively, last year's St. John's was back to the kind of team Pitino wants to see. They were an attacking defense, playing tight man-to-man, creating turnovers, challenging everything, and forcing opponents into late-shot clock situations when they didn't turn them over first. St. John's had elite perimeter defenders and when opponents did get inside, Zuby Ejiofor is a competent shot blocker and even better positional defender who uses his size to control the paint. The problem this year is that St. John's doesn't have the defensive personnel they had last year. The multitude of elite perimeter defenders just isn't there, and of the three players that posted the best DBPR in their most recent season (Mitchell, Ejiofor, Hopkins), it's unlikely that all three can play significant minutes together because of positional overlap and the reality that none of the three really stretch the floor. This chart shows the defensive block rate, steal percentage, and Defensive Baynesian Performance Rating from EvanMiya.com, which is generally considered the best single number for individual defensive analysis.

Data from kenpom.com and EvanMiya.com

Unless Darling, Sanon, Sellers, and Jackson transform into next-level defenders, the perimeter defense will be a sieve leaving Mitchell and Ejiofor overextended trying to cover for them most of the time. This team will get killed any time they are forced to switch and teams with effective ball movement will pick them apart. Having just 1-2 competent defenders trying to cover up for 3-4 poor defenders is how you end up ranked #57 nationally in defense (2024 kenpom rank).

2025-26 Outlook 

This might be the most talented team in the league, but I just don't see how this roster fits together to find success. The national consensus is that this team will have best offensive traits of 2024 and the best defensive traits of 2025. When I dig into this roster, however, I see the worst defensive traits of 2024 and the worst offensive traits of 2025.

On talent alone they should be a tournament team, but there are serious questions about the ability to create good shots on offense that no one is asking. The only way I see this offense consistently creating quality shots is if Dylan Darling is a 32-35 mpg guy, but I'm not at all convinced he's a high-major player, especially on the defensive end. There are glaring holes in the defense that can't be papered over by the guys on this roster. Unless Rick can find a way to succeed with two power forwards and two centers, none of whom can stretch the floor, there are going to be places to easily exploit the defense and players like Ejiofor and Mitchell will be forced to constantly cover up for the perimeter gaffes.

Since the transfer portal opened, Pitino started by saying Ian Jackson is his point guard, Zach Brazilier wrote a feature on Dylan Darling being in the mix to start, and after their first scrimmage Pitino named Oziyah Sellers the starting point guard. In the middle of all this over the summer, Rick Pitino said "There are no point guards anymore...Who's the point guard of the Knicks, Lakers, Celtics, Thunder?" While there are real questions about who the St. John's point guard will be, Jalen Brunson (Knicks), Luka Doncic (Lakers), and Shai Gilgeous-Alexander (Thunder) all are in the top-10 of NBA jersey sales for this past year. A college coach not recognizing some of the NBA's biggest stars may be mildly amusing, but there are bigger problems with that statement. Some NBA teams like Boston create offense through multiple creative hubs, as illustrated this past season as the Celtics had five players with 17.3%-27.0% assist rates. Rick Pitino isn't in the NBA and only has one guy with an assist rate over 12.0%.

In the college game, the only reason one could argue you don't need one point guard to win a National Championship is because in this generation, you typically need two. From Villanova with Ryan Arcidiacono and Jalen Brunson through UConn's pairing of Tristen Newton and Hassan Diarra, the trend in college basketball has been multiple creators. But the bigger problem for St. John's is that the teams that do eschew the traditional point guard have other players that can create shots. On this roster, Darling is it. This isn't a team with a wealth of creative options, it's a glut of players that have historically relied on teammates to get them their shots. The only place most of these guys can get their own shot is in the mid-range.

Last year, St. John's was in the 94th percentile in mid-range shots taken while scoring just 0.77 points/shot, even though they had a roster of players that historically were good at getting to the rim. The year before they were in the 82nd percentile in mid-range shots taken while scoring just 0.84 points/shot. That ranked 11th and 10th (out of 12) respectively in terms of the most efficient play types St. John's ran according to Hoop-Explorer. Essentially, this St. John's team is made up of players that cannot create their own shots on the perimeter, cannot get to the rim, and are playing for a coach that won't discourage mid-range shots, which are among the least efficient shots they can take. This is a recipe for mediocre offensive efficiency.

The optimistic St. John's fan will have to hope the offense looks like Houston's, with elite three-point shooting, offensive glass dominance, and never turning the ball over as the hallmarks of an offense that overcomes mid-range tendencies. But Pitino's offense has ranked in the top-60 nationally in three-point percentage once this millennium and that was over 20 years ago. As the chart above shows, few of these guys are able to get their own shots from three, unlike Houston with L.J. Cryer and Milos Uzan able to get shots off the bounce. His teams historically are okay at protecting the ball, but have never ranked in the top-20 like Houston did the past two years. Further, Houston was only incorporating one new rotation player into their system. Reforging this offense into Houston's doesn't feel like something that will happen overnight with players who are all just getting to know each other.

Defensively, the thought process is that if you give Rick Pitino players, he will turn them into a great defense. That argument has been proven false, however. In 2023-24, Pitino famously criticized his team's defensive effort when the St. John's defense was #31 in T-Rank's defensive efficiency. After that rant, the defense truly cratered, ranking #139 the rest of the way. Last year's elite defense was made up of known quality defenders like Richmond, Ejiofor, Scott, Luis, and Smith. There's virtually no lineup St. John's can put on the court that has three quality defenders without crippling the offensive spacing. The interior defense and rebounding could be excellent, but that will come at the cost of open looks from deep and the ability for movement offenses to isolate and pick apart even their plus defenders by forcing switches.

One Man's Opinion

When I first saw the names coming across the transfer wire, I was convinced Pitino was going to work magic again. But the more I looked at this roster, the less I understood the way it would fit together. Modern college offense relies on prioritization of quality shots and multiple players to create those shots for themselves or others. Modern college defense relies on having defenders at multiple levels to switch effectively and hide poor defenders. St. John's doesn't have either of these things. While there are talented, coveted players on this roster, they didn't exactly elevate their previous teams, as Dillon Mitchell, Joson Sanon, Oziyah Sellers, and Dylan Darling all missed the NCAA Tournament last year while Ian Jackson's team barely got in after a preseason top-10 ranking. This is a team built to disappoint in big moments, with breakdowns on the defensive end and one-on-one offense ending in bad shots.

I know this won't meet consensus, but I'm picking St. John's 4th in the Big East. There's too much talent to think this isn't a tourney team. There's too much experience on the sideline to think Pitino can't figure out a way to make some of this work. But the question of shot creation is real. I don't think Darling can play 32+ mpg at this level and there isn't enough shot creation for this offense to really work by committee. Zuby Ejiofor is seemingly an All-American and consensus Big East Player of the Year, but 57% of his made baskets last year were assisted. Where are those coming from if no one is feeding the post the way Kadary Richmond and Deivon Smith did? He's not scoring 15+ ppg on offensive rebounds alone. And I don't see how a defense with putrid defenders on the perimeter works. The reason St. John's was so good was because Richmond, Smith, Luis, Wilcher, and Ejiofor all had quickness and range that stretched beyond their individual position. They were also all plus defenders before St. John's turned into the #2 efficiency defense in the country. If it was just Darling, you can hide one bad defender. Maybe by mixing in zone and creative switching, you can hide two. But there's no way you can hide three bad defenders, especially when all three will be on the perimeter because any lineup with Ejiofor/Mitchell/Hopkins doesn't work on offense.

If anyone can prove me wrong, it's Rick Pitino. He's one of the best in the business for a reason. Given a full season, maybe this team will figure it out and be at their best by March, able to compete for a second weekend. But two years ago, we saw that he can't wave a magic wand and turn bad defenders into a good defense. Last year we saw that when he doesn't stop players with bad offensive tendencies from their own poor shot selection, it leads to bad offense. In 20 of the past 21 seasons, a team ranked in the AP preseason top-10 finished the year outside the top-25 and this St. John's team looks like a prime candidate to be that team in 2026. Maybe I'm wrong and Pitino really has one of the best teams in the country, but to me it looks like the Emperor has no clothes and someone should be willing to say it.

Wednesday, October 22, 2025

Providence Preview, 2025-26

Providence Friars

Monday, January 19th, 2026 at Fiserv Forum (Martin Luther King, Jr. Day) / Wednesday, March 4th, 2026 at Amica Mutual Pavilion, Providence, RI

Head Coach: Kim English (67-53 overall, 33-34 at Providence)

Three-Year NET Average: 71.3

Three-Year kenpom Average: 65.0

Projected 2025-26 T-Rank: 58

Kim English likely needs to win now to extend his time at Providence

Photo by Jessica Hill | AP Photo

State of the Program

Kim English has had mixed results in his two seasons in Providence. His 2024 team was right on the bubble when bid thieves pushed them away from the field while injuries last year (including to Bryce Hopkins) led to their worst season by win percentage since 1999-2000. The Friars hit the portal hard, bringing in a wealth of proven high-major talent. Maybe more important is the addition of assistant coach Bryan Tibaldi, who helped turn the Cleveland Cavaliers offense from the 19th best offense in the NBA in 2023-24 to #1 this past year. This feels like a do-or-die season for English, who may very well need an NCAA Tournament bid to keep his job.


Rotation

The keys to the offense will go to Jason Edwards, though it would be a misnomer to call him a point guard. He's more a scoring guard in a point guard's frame. He's a competent outside shooter who does well attacking downhill. Edwards strengths are on offense as he's a mediocre defender. He's flanked by Corey Floyd and Jaylin Sellers in the back court. Floyd has largely been a rotation piece in three years at Providence. Fans will hope he's fully healthy. Sellers is an elite catch-and-shoot weapon at the arc and excels scoring at the rim. Duncan Powell is on his fourth program in as many years. He was productive for Georgia Tech but really turned it up late in the season, averaging 16.6 ppg over Tech's final 16 games. He's a physical forward that can give the Friars some of the presence they lost with Bryce Hopkins. Powell should benefit from having floor-spacing guards like Edwards and Sellers. Up front, Oswin Erhunmwunse was one of two Friars named to the Big East all-Freshman team last year. In limited minutes, he was an elite rim protector on defense and at-the-rim finisher on offense. He has real breakout potential as a sophomore especially given the options around him. Fellow Big East all-freshman team member Ryan Mela and FSU transfer Daquan Davis provide high-upside depth while Drexel transfer Cole Hargrove gives the Friars experienced front court support. Keep an eye on Estonian import Stefan Vaaks, he's already becoming a fan favorite but has some legit experience playing in FIBA competition.

Style of Play

Last year we were spot on in expecting Providence's long-range shooting to improve (32.5% to 35.6%) but at the cost of their at-the-rim efficiency (59.4% to 56.2%). Ultimately, this led to some overall offensive improvement, but likely not as much as English hoped for because of a turnover-prone back court. They did address that in the portal, letting some of their worst ATR players leave while retaining the better options and adding players who are better at the rim than those that left. This matters because the Friars initiate their offense with the dribble drive. This generates their best looks either through rim finishes or kicking out for open threes. English likes to run offense through the bigs as well, but Oswin wasn't as well suited as Josh Oduro to post up or high-low actions. Most of the big man scoring and shot creation was either Oswin cutting to the dunker spot or cleaning up offensive rebounds. A second year in the system coupled with a more versatile big in Hargrove should allow for more offense to go through the middle. If there's any real issue, it might be the lack of shot creation. This roster is full of guys happy to take shots but not many options that create for others. That's where Tibaldi comes in. He'll be tasked with finding ways to create those shots, possibly through multiple creative outlets like he had in Cleveland.

At the rim conversion percentages from Hoop-Explorer.com

Tactically, Providence is focused on taking away good shots. Chase teams off the three point line, funnel to the middle where the bigs await to block shots, and use that rim protection threat to force less efficient midrange looks. The problem is that while it's sound tactically, their effectiveness in that regard has tanked once they get to Big East play. There's certainly a step up in competition when it comes to league play, but they've been competitive with tourney teams in non-con, so it isn't like they are only beating up on cupcakes. The other problem is that Providence has ranked outside the top-100 in defensive turnover rate and defensive rebound rate the last two years. So when their ability to challenge shots breaks down, they aren't generating turnovers or limiting teams to a single shot to offset the eFG% dropoff. To contend for a tourney bid, this team needs to keep their defensive intensity and efficiency up for the entire season, not just the first two months.

2025-26 Outlook 

Edwards was a certified star for Vanderbilt's NCAA team last year. Sellers and Powell were productive high-major players. With blossoming young players Erhunmwunse and Mela back, this team has no excuses when it comes to hearing their name on Selection Sunday. It feels very much like a make or break year for English, and in terms of raw talent, there is more than enough there to be dancing come March. That said, there are some legitimate questions. Who will run the offense? Edwards is a shooting guard in a point guard frame, and these are all guys who generally have benefitted from having creative guards to get them the ball rather than being the creators themselves. Will the defense hold up over a full season? Erhunmwunse was an excellent defensive center while Mela, Hargrove, Sellers, and Davis are all proven plus defenders at the high major level, but as we see, the conference defensive dropoff has been a real problem. Perhaps most important, can English coach this team to a bid? While Ed Cooley was excellent in close games, English is just 8-12 in games decided by four points or fewer or in overtime. When Providence is looking for the results that determine if they are in or out, will English be able to win enough of those games to tilt things in the Friars advantage? This team is good enough paper and certainly should be an NCAA Tournament team. How the pieces come together on the court will determine if they get there or not.

One Man's Opinion

We have Providence 5th in the Big East. While English's teams have been pretty good about balancing their shots between the arc and the rim, how they create those shots has led to mediocre efficiency, even with Big East Player of the Year Devin Carter there. Having someone like Tibaldi to truly modernize the offense should pay major dividends (as Marquette has seen with Nevada Smith). Defensively, the pieces are there to be competent and the wealth of experience should help them maintain some consistency there. Look for Edwards to challenge for the league's scoring title, Oswin to emerge as a star, and English to finally reach the NCAA Tournament.