Portal Kombat: Choose Your Fighter

 

There are still options for Marquette to upgrade their rotation

For the first two weeks of the portal, it was a stressful but ultimately incredibly fun time to be a Marquette fan. With glaring needs at the center position and a secondary wing ball-handler, the additions of Sananda Fru and Nolan Minessale seemed to be the perfect fits for a Marquette squad intent on getting back to the top of the Big East and the NCAA Tournament. But with just hours left for student athletes to enter the transfer portal, Marquette fans learned that while the portal giveth, it also taketh away.

Marquette big man Sheek Pearson has entered the transfer portal, source told ESPN. Former top-50 recruit reclassified into the 2025 class and redshirted this past season with the Golden Eagles.

— Jeff Borzello (@jeffborzello) April 22, 2026

Marquette already seemed to have a need for a guard off the bench, with no experienced ball-handlers beyond Nigel James and Minessale. The departure of Pearson left Marquette without its top center option as well, as Caedin Hamilton was removed from the starting lineup and relegated to limited bench minutes by the end of this past season and Josh Clark struggled to establish a regular role in the rotation. Marquette is left with two open scholarships and two pretty clear needs.

With those needs in mind, we enter Portal Kombat. But instead of choosing between Kano, Sonya, and Sub-Zero, college basketball fans have options like Divine, Nzeh, Mack, and the secret unlockable character, Gold. The portal may be closed for new entrants (for now...more on that later) but there are players in the portal that Marquette could add to address those two bench needs. Today we'll take a look at some of those options to give Marquette fans an idea of how the roster could still be upgraded by addressing the bench, provided they have enough credits to select their character. Note that the year listed is what they will be in the 2026-27 season.

Combo Guards

Divine Ugochukwu, Michigan State (6'3", 195, Jr)

This guy looks like he was built in a lab to play in Shaka Smart's system. I don't know if Ugochukwu would be willing to come in for a role that wasn't as a starter, but if he did, it would be ideal. While he's just 6'3", he boasts a massive 6'8" wingspan, which gives him the ability to guard players bigger than his listed size. He's a high efficiency (120.3 Adj ORtg) guard who earned a starting role for the Spartans before being sidelined with a foot injury. He was also a late portal entry, so there's likely time to get involved. Ugochukwu was a positive player on both ends in both RAPM (2.3) and BPR (2.3). He's an excellent finisher, shooting 65.4% at the rim and 44.2% from three. While his passing isn't elite (17.0% assist rate) what's appealing is how he achieves that passing. He is elite hitting cutters and passing in pick and roll. It's exactly what Marquette needs in a ball-handler. In addition, he can shoot, drive, and get out in transition with high-level efficiency. This is a guy who could step in with confidence at any time and fill in for any of the starters 1-3 to give elite rotational coverage.

Christian Jones, George Washington (6'4", 200, Jr)

Jones would arrive with two years of eligibility after starting all 34 games against D1 opponents for the Revolutionaries and averaging 10.0 ppg/3.0 rpg/3.1 apg. Jones posted a 2.2 RAPM and 2.8 BPR, with positive scores in both on the offensive and defensive side. He is a proven provider (21.3% assist rate) and shooter (36.4 3PFG%). He doesn't stand out as a star in any regard, but he's good at a lot of things. Looking at his Hoop-Explorer Play Profile, he's an above average shooter both in catch and shoot and pull-ups, is a good pick-and-roll passer, and does well enough in transition. His driving may be a bit lackluster but at least he's willing and hopefully more coaching would help him improve in that regard.

Sebastian Mack, Missouri (6'3", 195, Sr)

Mack got off to a decent start at Missouri, averaging 10.6 ppg/1.8 rpg/1.0 apg/1.4 spg in his first 8 games. Then it all went south. His averages all sank, he had career lows in efficiency, three-point shooting, and assist rate. When I asked a Missouri fan what happened, he responded "Not a fit at all, and he made the court look like it was a slip 'n slide and spent as much time falling down as he did on his feet." While that's less than appealing, it might provide Mack as a buy-low option on a player that could be a really good fit if he regained his 2024-25 form when he was at UCLA. That season, Mack was efficient (105.1 ORtg), created for others (15.8% assist rate), and was at his best going downhill to the hoop. He's always been a good defender, particularly when it comes to generating turnovers. If the staff were looking for someone who has proven themselves before at the high-major level and were willing to take a chance on a reclamation project, Mack could be a good option.

Centers

Ben Defty, Boston University (7'0", 255, Jr)

If Marquette wanted a like-for-like Fru backup, they couldn't find someone with a closer statistical profile than Defty. He's a high-efficiency big man (121.7 ORtg) who is elite at the rim (72.3%), as a shot-blocker (7.0%), and on the glass (8.7% OR, 20.7% DR). While there's some risk with big men who anchored bad defenses (BU ranked #348 per kenpom) it's hard to blame Defty for that. Defty was the only player on BU with positive RAPM and DBPR scores, and there was a massive gap between him and the next best defender in both metrics. The biggest question is how he would handle the step up in competition. I would caution against those who criticize Defty because of his numbers against Tier A+B competition. In his career, he only had 3 games out of 63 against such opponents with two of the three outings over 100 ORtg. The sample size simply isn't large enough to draw any meaningful conclusions.

Kachi Nzeh, Little Rock (6'8", 225, Sr)

Nzeh had by far his most productive season so far at Little Rock after stints at Xavier and Penn State, posting 11.7 ppg/4.8 rpg/1.3 apg. He rated as a negative RAPM and BPR player on both ends of the court, but that's likely more because Little Rock was a sub-300 team and poor on both offense and defense. He was a positive contributor per RAPM in his previous high-major seasons. Nzeh can play both front court positions, has consistently been over 60% at the rim for his career, and last year added 40.4% three point shooting (on 114 attempts) to his offensive arsenal. He also does a bit of everything on offense, even if not at elite levels. He'd likely be worth taking a flyer as someone who has high-major experience and has been a positive contributor in low to moderate minute loads.

Devin Williams, Florida Atlantic (6'10", 210, Jr)

Williams played both the 4 and the 5 for FAU. Williams isn't a great offensive player, but he's at least serviceable. He converts 62.7% of his shots at the rim and has the ability to step out to the three-point line a couple times per game, making 33.3% from deep mostly on pick-and-pop actions like what Ben Gold used to get looks at Marquette. He's an excellent offensive rebounder (10.2% OR) but does turn it over a bit more than you'd like. The defensive end is where he really shines, with a monster 11.1% block rate (9th nationally), 1.1 DRAPM, and 1.58 DBPR. When he was on the floor, teams were 3.2% less likely to attempt shots at the rim and 8.1% worse on those attempts (50.2% on to 58.3% off). As long as Williams offensive usage stayed low, he looks like a capable complement to either Royce Parham or Sananda Fru.

There's also one more wrinkle worth discussing. Recently, NCAA President Charlie Baker came out in support of allowing college athletes five years to complete five seasons. If this were to pass with immediate effect, players like Chase Ross and Ben Gold would be eligible to plan an additional season. There are still many questions to be answered around this. If it passes, will returning fifth year players be given the option to enter the portal, or will they have to have entered the portal before this went into effect, like North Carolina's Seth Trimble? Will extra scholarships be allowed so teams that filled their roster spots can retain graduate seniors? If they create an additional portal entry period, will this only be open to graduate seniors to enter the portal or will it give the chance for all current players to enter again?

Later this year, college sports could be ready to vote on the biggest change to eligibility since 1972. Five in five isn’t just a concept limited to a committee room anymore, it’s something the NCAA president is actively pushing hard for. https://t.co/VrSYgeNs3x

— Bryan Fischer (@BryanDFischer) April 22, 2026

If Marquette is to bring back one of their graduates, the most likely would seem to be Ben Gold. The staff does not want any questions about the leadership of this team, which makes it more likely that Gold would return over Chase Ross, who frequently had the ball in his hands in late game situations that went awry (Dayton, Oklahoma, Villanova, to name a few). In addition, it's pretty clear that Nolan Minessale fills the Chase role but the third big man role that Sheek Pearson was expected to fill is still vacant and it seems unlikely the staff would be comfortable with the current options as opposed to someone like Gold who thrived in a reserve big role in the past.

F Ben Gold, Marquette (6'11", 235, Gr)

In many ways, Gold seems ideal for this spot. He's always been a high-efficiency, low usage big that is capable of playing in the middle, where he started for the bulk of the past two seasons, or in more of a stretch-four role that he slid into when paired with a more traditional down low player like Caedin Hamilton. Offensively, Ben has been over 63% at the rim every season at Marquette and he showed consistent three-point progress until last year's backslide. His rebounding improved significantly over his time here. He has been a positive contributor on both the offensive and defensive end in both RAPM and BPR each of the past three years. Gold knows the system and would be able to play in the middle alongside Parham as he did most of last year or step in alongside Fru as more of a pick-and-pop player. In addition, he was a higher efficiency shooter when he was at lower usage, and with the roster as constructed he would almost certainly be a bench option since Fru was specifically brought in to man the middle and Ben was significantly behind the returning big three (James, Stevens, Parham) in conference play minutes last year. For Gold's play profiles, I'm including each of the past two years to see not just what he looked like last year but also what he looked like when he was in a reduced role, more similar to what would be expected if he returned.

Whether Marquette stays with the roster as constructed, looks to add through the current portal, holds off for the fifth year ruling, or considers adding reclassified 2027 recruits as 2026 freshmen remains to be seen, but if they opt for the portal, there are still some good options out there that would improve the team. One website I've been playing around with lately is ShootyHoops.com that allows you to see where they project teams with portal additions made. Currently, Marquette ranks #22 on that site, but adding Ben Defty and Christian Jones brings them up to #13. It's just one site and just one projection, but improving the bench will make the team better while improving the floor, guarding against injuries, and helping a player like Nigel James to not get burned out by February as we saw with Kam Jones in 2024-25.

Nolan Minessale Commits to Marquette

From Hilltopper to Golden Eagle, Nolan Minessale is transferring to Marquette

Photo from JSOnline.com

In the 2024 WIAA Boys High School Championship Game, Marquette University High School star Nolan Minessale led the Hilltoppers with 29 points as they beat Arrowhead 84-62 to clinch the school's first state title. After two years at St. Thomas, Minessale is going to be putting on another Marquette uniform, this time a few blocks east of the MUHS campus at Marquette. Minessale was a first team all-Summit League player after averaging 19.8 ppg, 4.6 rpg, and 4.3 apg.

Minessale is an intriguing two-way prospect. He has good size at 6'5" but more impressively boasts a 7'0" wingspan. This gives him excellent positional versatility as he played PG, SG, SF, and PF at St. Thomas, while also sometimes jumping the tip due to his length and athleticism. At Marquette he could compete for a starting spot while giving coverage at multiple positions.

Offensively, Minessale is a high efficiency player who primarily played as a wing but looked equally comfortable in the lead guard role. St. Thomas was 9.7 adjusted points/100 possessions better on offense with Minessale on the floor. He can create shots for himself and others. Minessale thrives getting to the hoop, where he is an elite finisher who can convert above the rim while also getting to the free throw line. He's also an adept passer who can spray outside or thread the needle in pick and roll. His biggest weakness is three point accuracy, but with 42 made threes this past season he will still draw a defender out there. In terms of versatility he has some similarity to Kam Jones in that he can play on or off the ball, initiate the offense, and finish at the rim. Kam was a better shooter, Nolan is a better rebounder and gets to the line more often.

Defensively, Minessale uses his length to be disruptive and is difficult to get past. St. Thomas was a staggering 13.9 adjusted points/100 better on defense with Minessale on the floor. He's good at generating turnovers and shot blocking (5.0% block rate as a freshman). And while Summit League teams aren't known for their defense, Minessale graded out as the best defender on a top-150 defense last year.

The biggest question will be how he scales up to the Big East. At a glance, it's clear to see his efficiency dropped off against the type of competition he'll be seeing every week in the Big East. I'd say this is a minor concern. Individual efficiency is often driven by team efficiency, and mid-major teams generally tend to fare worse against Tier A+B competition because of the talent discrepancy. As long as those numbers don't drop off a cliff (30-50 points worse) I'm not as disturbed as I once was by these declines. It's also a small sample size, just 11 out of 62 games played.

Looking at this past year, that depression was largely driven by turnovers and three point percentage. But as the primary offensive option, he was still able to create shots, defend, get into the lane, finish, and get to the line. At Marquette, he won't draw the same defensive attention which should mitigate the weaknesses while allowing the positives to still thrive. As a freshman, his drop was almost exclusively due to a shooting decline in non-conference play. But as his eFG% was 40.4% in the first three of those games as a true freshman in his first month of D1 basketball and it rose to 60.0% (with all individual game efficiency ratings over 120.0), he certainly seemed to acclimate to those games as the season went on.

In terms of skillset, Minessale looks like a great fit. If he starts, his length and athleticism allow him to slot in alongside Nigel James and Adrien Stevens as a third guard or wing. His ball handling and creation essentially puts another point guard on the floor and he provides cover when one of those two goes to the bench. He's a rim/three focused offensive player as 87.1% of his shots came from the parts of the floor Marquette emphasizes.

It's worth noting how good Minessale is at what Marquette wants to do. Per Hoop Explorer he's in the 80th or better efficiency in attacking the rim, drive and kick, hitting cutters, making cuts from the perimeter, and passing in pick and roll. Those are also five of his six most frequently used play types, so it isn't just being good at what Shaka Smart wants but maximizing that. He's only average in transition but his frequency shows he is willing and able to get out and run.

We'll close with a recommendation to read an evaluation from KJ Scouting. He regards Minessale as an NBA prospect and put together a great video demonstrating what he can do on the court and why he could thrive not just in the Big East but beyond. Welcome to Marquette, Nolan.

And for those of you who are very online, a warm Marquette welcome to cousin Mia Minessale as well.

Sananda Fru Commits to Marquette

 

Marquette has added Louisville transfer center Sananda Fru

Photo by Michael Hickey | Getty Images

Marquette has secured the services of the first men's basketball Division I transfer since Darryl Morsell committed in the summer of 2021 with the addition of 6'11" Louisville center Sananda Fru. Fru immediately projects as the starting center and the type of major impact piece Marquette wanted to announce their reentry to the transfer portal. Fru ranks as the #4 transfer in the country per EvanMiya.com and seems like a particularly good fit for Marquette's style.

The coaching staff first announced their intentions on February 14 through a sideline report from Jared Greenberg in the game at Xavier. Greenberg said "Marquette is the last high-major men's basketball program to resist going into the transfer portal, and now those days appear to be coming to an end."

So what do we know about Sananda Fru on the court? Let's start with a quick statistical breakdown:

On the offensive end, Fru is an elite player, ranking #39 in the country in offensive efficiency. This is largely because of his dunking ability, where he converted 62/68 attempts, which made up half of his two-point field goal makes. Fru was #2 in the nation in 2PFG%, something that was sorely lacking at Marquette last year. He's also a high-level offensive rebounder so he can give himself the chances to create those shots. Fru also does something Marquette hasn't seen much from the center position since Oso Ighodaro left. He scores 1.319 points per possession on Pick & Roll rolls to the rim. Coming from a Louisville program where more than half the attempts came from three, he will likely see more plays designed for him. While his three-point percentage looks impressive, I would caution that he only had eight attempts.

Fru might be an even better fit on the defensive end. This is in part because Louisville does not play the drop coverage that has grown in popularity but still isn't embraced at Marquette, which means he will already be familiar with switching and guarding different players. He's an excellent shot blocker and has good defensive activity. His DRAPM and DBPR scores, both metrics that measure overall defensive impact, are better than any returning Marquette player. Essentially, Fru gives Marquette a true rim protector and versatile interior defender with high-level athletic ability.

Every transfer will also come with some criticisms. Fru did lose his starting spot down the stretch at Louisville and Cardinal fans I've talked to have described him as soft. He committed 4.2 fouls per 40 minutes, a number that rose to 4.6 in ACC play and 5.1 against Tier A&B competition per kenpom. And while he gets to the charity stripe well (52.9% FT Rate) he only converts at a 61.1% clip, which is by far not the most important thing but will frustrate some fans. It's also worth noting that system fit makes a big difference. Years ago, Joseph Chartouny seemed like an ideal fit to create shots for Markus Howard and the Hausers while being the perimeter tip of the spear on defense, but the system muted his impact and that transfer never fully worked. Marquette fans will hope Coach Smart is better at fitting Fru into his system than Wojo was with Chartouny.

In addition, despite the demotion, Sananda Fru still managed to put up 10 points and 10 rebounds in Louisville's first round NCAA win over South Florida. Pat Kelsey said "Being nice to you hasn't helped, maybe I just need to scream my ass off at you and you play like a freaking monster." Big men often tend to do better after a transfer, possibly due to the new staff identifying players that have already proven at the D1 level they fit into the specific system a team will run.

Milwaukee should be a particularly good fit for Fru. He was born in Berlin, Germany and played professionally for Löwen Braunschweig, tallying 12.4 ppg and 6.2 rpg as he won Best Young Player honors in 2024-25. Few cities in the country have as many local ties to Germanic culture. I would point out to Fru that Milwaukee German Fest will be July 24-26, there are a number of German restaurants in Milwaukee including Mader's and the Old German Beer Hall, and volunteer opportunities reading to children at the Milwaukee German Immersion School.

Welcome to the transfer portal era, Marquette fans.

You down with OPP? Offseason Portal Prep?

 It's officially official portal season for #mubb. Returners to the roster (majority anyway) have been announced so we discuss our excitement about who's officially returning. We then talk about who isn't returning (spoiler, we think those are positive too) and discuss what to make about the players on this roster of which there have been no mention whatsoever. Based on what's been announced and what we speculate about the unannounced players, we provide our recipe for a successful portal season with 3 known roster spots available. One other change we need to discuss is Nevada Smith leaving to head coach Siena. First of all, congrats coach we'll miss you but also please don't take your jar of magic beans with you. We discuss how Nevada's departure impacts the staff and program going forward and what we're looking for in a new staff member. Buckle up, this is the fun part. Enjoy!

 

https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/2bku6twph4kh9y4g/2026_April_5_PPP7kh63.mp3

This is the end....of the season

 Well, the #mubb season ended kinda sorta like we thought it would. We spend a little bit of time talking about the Big East Tournament but pretty quickly pivot to the most important off season in the program since at least Covid. We talk about what the issues are, what we expect from Shaka, and what we would prescribe for the team to find success next season. We close out with an overview of the college basketball landscape that Marquette is competing in. There is no doubting the pod will be back somewhat frequently unlike offseasons of the past. Enjoy!

https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/xuudn966hsf7wt73/2026_March_15_the_end9aq09.mp3

 

Cracketology: Contingency Plans

It's rare that nearly every game on Sunday seems to have some level of meaning aside from just the automatic bid, but with the exception of the American Final, all of the results will impact someone on the seed list. With that in mind, I'm going to go into this with the following expectations, picking the team that would rank higher in the seed list to win all of their respective finals:

• YALE over Penn in the Ivy League Final
• VANDERBILT over Arkansas in the SEC Final
• VCU over Dayton in the Atlantic 10 Final
• SOUTH FLORIDA over Wichita in the American Final
• MICHIGAN over Purdue in the Big 10 Final

Now let's talk contingency plans:

PENN WINS IVY LEAGUE: If the upset happens, Yale is eliminated and every team from 50-Northern Iowa to 57-Wright State moves up one spot. This means that High Point becomes a 12-seed, Hawaii becomes a 13-seed, and Penn slots in as the new 57, making them a 14-seed.

ARKANSAS WINS SEC: Vanderbilt moved up to the last 3-seed on the expectation of being SEC Champs. If the Razorbacks win, Vandy and Nebraska swap spots. Nebraska is the last 3-seed and Vanderbilt is the top 4-seed. Arkansas remains unchanged.

DAYTON WINS ATLANTIC 10: If the Flyers pull the upset, that eliminates 45-San Diego State from the field and Dayton is slotted into #45 overall and an 11-seed. VCU stays at #43 but is now playing in Dayton as the second to last at-large.

WICHITA STATE WINS AMERICAN: If the Shockers shock the Bulls, they simply take their spot. No change, the American champ is #46 overall and an 11-seed.

PURDUE WINS BIG 10: If the Boilermakers win, Arizona would jump Michigan to #2 overall as the Wolverines would fall to #3, but both would remain on the 1-line. Purdue would jump up ahead of Michigan State to #8 overall as the last 2-seed.

We'll wrap with a quick bubble discussion, then have the final projected Seed List.

Ultimately, I went with San Diego State over Auburn and Texas. It was three teams for one spot. While San Diego State was the lowest in WAB (#47, -0.15 score) that is on par with Xavier from last year (#49, -0.12) who was the last team in. Auburn (#44, +0.40) has some nice wins, but 16 total losses would be the most ever for an at-large team and 17-16 would be the worst winning percentage for an at-large team. Auburn is also 11-16 in Q1-3, which would be by far the worst ever record in that range (last year's Texas was 13-15, the only sub-.500 Q1-3 record to earn an at-large). Texas (#46, +0.00) also has good wins, but they are 10-14 in Q1-3, which would also be the worst ever selected. San Diego State may not have the top end wins, but also didn't have the opportunity volume that Auburn and Texas had. They did, however, go 15-11 in Q1-3 and don't have any of the fatal flaw numbers the other two have.

I feel like no matter which team I pick here, I'll be wrong. This decision gets easier if Dayton wins the A-10 and knocks this spot completely out of the field, but for now I'm going with San Diego State as the last team in. 

This is my best shot at a bracket, but it could change a lot in the next few hours. The Committee will definitely have contingencies.

Cracketology: Another 48 Hours

Did Nijel Pack & Oklahoma do enough to earn an at-large bid?

Photo by Morgan Givens | University of Oklahoma

We're drawing closer to the NCAA Selection Show. As I write this, we are two days out from seeing the full bracket. So where do things stand? Let's dig in with a quick look at the biggest questions facing the Selection Committee between now and Sunday.

Who are the most likely bid thieves?

• Atlantic 10 - Dayton: Over the last month, the Flyers are playing like the best team in the A-10, ranked #27 in T-Rank ahead of #40 VCU. Included in that stretch is a decisive win over St. Louis, who they play in Saturday's semifinal.
• Big East - Seton Hall: By the time you read this, the Pirates may be done, but if they can get by St. John's (they played within single digits twice), the Pirates have a win over UConn each year since the Huskies rejoined the Big East.
• MAC - Akron: The MAC is guaranteed to have a bid thief with Miami (OH) eliminated, and the Zips were the metric favorite to win the automatic bid from the start. They defeated the three remaining semifinalists by an average of 13.0 ppg in the regular season.
• Mountain West - San Diego State: The Aztecs are favored over New Mexico, but whomever wins that game will be the best shot at a bid thief. It's likely too late for either to earn an at-large, so the only path to a second Mountain West bid is if Utah State loses.
• SEC - Oklahoma: The Sooners are getting some late at-large buzz, but it's reminiscent of 2022 Texas A&M, who also had a long January into February losing streak only to try to make up for that in the SEC Tournament. I think it's automatic bid or bust for Oklahoma.

Who will land on the right side of the bubble?

• In - Missouri: The Tigers might be sweating with some bid thieves, but they have five wins over the field including beating Florida. They also have wins over the two closest SEC contenders, Auburn and Oklahoma. They should hear their name on Selection Sunday.
• In - SMU: The Mustangs are in, but bid thieves could certainly knock them out. Their four Q1 wins and 45 WAB should be enough, but all it would take is a few bid thieves to knock them out.
• Barely In - VCU: The Rams would be well-suited to make bracketologists lives easier by winning the A-10 auto bid. Their 39 resume average and 42 WAB is appealing, but they don't have any wins over another at-large team in the field, with neutral court wins over South Florida and Virginia Tech along with a road win at Dayton the highlights of their resume. If there's another 1-2 bid thieves and VCU doesn't punch their own ticket, they could easily be left out.
• Barely In - Texas: The Longhorns are only 17-14, a mark that rarely makes the field, but they have 6 wins over at-large teams in the field. Their WAB of 46 is as bubbly as can be and they are quite simply the best of a group of not great options. 
• Barely Out - Oklahoma: If you put Oklahoma's resume up against the rest of the bubble with no context, they might be in over VCU or Texas. But wins over South Carolina and Texas A&M came in the SEC Tournament and it's hard to know how much those will be valued. No one had this team in 48 hours ago, not sure I can get there because of two wins since then.
• Barely Out - San Diego State/New Mexico: These teams are the Spider-Man meme. Separated by 1 in NET, 1 in WAB, both are 2-6 in Q1, have 8 Q1+2 wins, and have losses in Q3. I just don't think either have quite done enough. They likely need the auto-bid.
• Out - Auburn: Yes, they played a tough schedule and won some big games. However they also have 16 losses and are one game above a .500 record. No team has ever made the at-large field with that many losses or that poor a winning percentage. They had chances and didn't make the most of them.

What is Miami-Ohio's Fate?

Where the Redhawks land is one of the most debated conversations at the moment. Despite their loss to UMass, that was still a Q3 loss and while it will prevent them from moving up, we're going to stick with their resume average of 39.7 and as a result they landed on the 10-line as the 40th overall team. The seed was primarily based on two factors.

First, last year's Memphis had a 17.0 resume average and a 52.3 predictive average. Typically, the average of those two would predict the seed, with a slight weighting advantage to the predictives, which would suggest Memphis should've been an 8 or 9 seed. Instead, the Selection Committee followed their resume average and gave them a 5-seed. Second, this team started 31-0 and there's no way that a team with a 31-1 record should be at risk of having to play a game in Dayton just to get to the Thursday/Friday games.

With that in mind, the Redhawks have a 39.7 resume average and a 91.0 predictive average. I'm throwing out the predictives like the Committee did for Memphis last year and strictly following their resume average for a 10-seed. Even if there are four more bid thieves, I think Miami should be above Dayton, no matter what line they land on.

At this point, I'm not sure if it's surprising or just the universe trying to tell me something that following the bracketing principles, Miami (OH) is once again facing Miami (FL), this time because the Redhawks were the last 10-seed placed and the only opening was against the Hurricanes. Suppose at some point, you just have to lean into the bit.

Okay...here's the current Seed List and Bracket. It's primarily based on Thursday's results, but nothing today has significantly changed that, if anything it reinforced what we already had, largely thanks to the Wisconsin win over Illinois.

Multi-bid Leagues

SEC: 10

Big 10: 9

ACC: 8

Big 12: 8

Big East: 3

WCC: 3

A-10: 2

MAC: 2

Cracketology: Championship Week is Here!

It's been a long time since we got one of these posted, but this seems as good a time as any to reset where the bracket stands with less than a week until Selection Sunday. Let's talk through some of the key decisions from the top to the bottom of the Seed List:

The Protected Seeds: With Marquette's upset of UConn, the top-8 may have a slightly different order but it's hard to see any of those teams not currently landing on those lines. Iowa State or Purdue might be able to sneak up to the 2-line, Nebraska and Texas Tech are pretty close on the 3/4 cut, but these feel pretty solid. Vanderbilt or Arkansas might have a good case for a 4-seed with a run, but will the Selection Committee weigh a Sunday result that heavily to potentially upend the entire bracket by moving a team that impacts pod location? It feels unlikely.

The Not So Big East: UConn is solidly on the 2-line and still has a shot at a 1-seed if they win the Big East Tournament and Florida bows out early. St. John's looks like a solid 5-seed while Villanova is comfortably on the 7-line. Beyond that, the only chance at any extra bids is a bid thief. No one else can earn an at-large out of this league. If Marquette can beat Xavier, repeat their upset against UConn, and pull a stunner on Friday Night at the Garden, who knows? Maybe there were really 2 in 14,000,605 possibilities of a Marquette bid.

Hard Calls #1 - Wisconsin: Pop quiz! How many teams have 3 road wins over top-10 teams in the NET? The answer is one, and it's the Badgers. The consensus has Bucky on the 6-line, but we pushed them up to the 5-line because of these quality wins. North Carolina might have a better top to bottom resume, but will be without likely lottery pick Caleb Wilson in the NCAA Tournament. We believe Wisconsin's wins at Michigan, Illinois, and Purdue boost the Badgers higher than most expect, and don't be shocked if they can play their way up as high as the 4-line.

Hard Calls #2 - Miami, OH: First, I'll note that the Redhawks are NOT in as the MAC automatic bid, they are an at-large. This is because until a conference champ is determined, we use the highest NET ranking rather than league record to determine our auto-bids. Most seem to think if Miami is an at-large, their terrible predictive metrics could push them to the 11-line and possibly even Dayton. I don't think so. Last year, Memphis had poor predictives, but their resume average indicated they deserved a 5-seed. I was stunned when I had Memphis as an 8-seed, roughly splitting their resume and predictives, but they landed as the 5-seed the resume suggested. I think Miami will be similarly benefitted this year. If they're an at-large, I'll seed them one line below where their resume average indicates they should be (currently 33.7 would be a 9-seed). If they win the automatic bid, I'll seed them in line with their resume average. As a result, I expect the Redhawks will land between the 8-10 seed lines rather than the 11-seed most have them slotted into.

Hard Calls #3: Last Team In: Usually the last few are difficult, but the resumes of Missouri, Texas, and VCU, all teams I project to play in Dayton, were pretty clearly on the inside of the field. The last spot, however, was very difficult. I started the day with Stanford as the Last Team In. Their 49 WAB is a little lower than I'd like, but five Quadrant 1 wins and a winning Quadrant 1+2 record looked attractive...until they lost to Pitt, which will knock their WAB out of the top-50 and gives them a fourth Quadrant 3 loss. After that, it was between Indiana, SMU, and Virginia Tech. I didn't like picking the Hoosiers, but they had better top-end wins and a better WAB than SMU. Ultimately, this spot will likely be taken by a bid thief, but as it stands we're going with Indiana.

Here is the Seed List and Bracket as it stands:

Happiest week of the season?

 Well, we didn't see that coming but it made it all the more fun. #mubb goes 2-0 for the first time since the first week of the season which includes a bit of a stunner over #4 UCONN. #scrambledeggs breaks down the victory over the Huskies and spends a little time on the PC beat down. We then talk this week in Marquette history before turning to the conference tournament ahead, where anything can happen. While a long off season is staring us in the face, we're hoping much like the plague victim in Monty Python and the Holy Grail "I'm not dead yet". Enjoy!

 

https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/32mpvi3dwxidx34m/2026_March_8_Happy_Pod9oq7z.mp3

 

The warning lights are back on

Well, we thought we were getting better and then DePaul showed up against #mubb. #ScrambledEggs is back and talking about a very up and down week. The most important result was how the team looked overall against DePaul which resulted in the first regular season sweep of Marquette in 4 decades. The first half was a clear return to the early season performances that had us all depressed. We try to process the week's results and also put it all into context with the upcoming off season. We also put a marker down for what we think next years team has to do to avoid a significant fan revolt and/or major changes within leadership. We then look at the week ahead and the odds of winning a game before closing out with memories and Markus Howard. Enjoy!

 

https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/397nynneucysq7si/2026_March_1_almost_done9tix5.mp3

 

We Gotta Talk about the Upperclassmen

The #mubb season continues to trudge along with little green shoots that are generally overwhelmed by late game glitches and segments of incompetence. We kick off the pod not with a break down of the St John's game but evaluating the upperclassmen in general and the seniors specifically. This is brought on in reaction to commentary from Shaka Smart in his post game press conference. We then pivot to the Marquette moment in history which highlights the peak Buzz experience. We close out the pod with discussion on Dr. Strange's one path to an NCAA berth and the week ahead. Enjoy!

 

 

https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/2id5g5t8qhwjbjxb/2026_Feb_22_Chase_stinks6q1ry.mp3

 

Cracketology: Top-16 Preview

Dusty May & Michigan are comfortably the top overall seed

Photo by Rey Del Rio | Getty Images

 

It feels like it's a week late, but tomorrow bracketologists get their annual reset as the current Top-16 Reveal will give everyone a snapshot of where the top teams in the country stand and who's just outside looking in. Cracketology has your preview of what we expect to see when the Reveal comes out. We'll talk a bit about the toughest decisions on each seed line and why teams landed where they did.

1-Michigan Wolverines: This might have been controversial a week ago, but the Wolverines are now the only 1-loss team in the country, they rank #1 in six of the seven team sheet metrics, are tied for the lead in Quadrant 1 wins and lead the nation in Quadrant 1+2 wins. It was the right call a week ago, it is an easy call today.

2-Duke Blue Devils: Duke's metrics are second only to Michigan, they are tied in Quadrant 1 and second in Quadrant 1+2 wins, but where they separate from the Wildcats is their six Quadrant 1A wins to Arizona's four. Doing that against a tougher schedule also reinforces their position here.

3-Arizona Wildcats: Despite their two losses, Arizona is still clearly a 1-seed. The metrics, Quadrant 1 wins, and what they've done against a tougher schedule than any of the next three teams make them a lock for the top line.

4-Houston Cougars: The positive case for Houston is that their predictive average puts them here. Compared to Iowa State they have more Quadrant 1 and Quadrant 1+2 wins against a tougher schedule. Compared to UConn, they have more Quadrant 1+2 wins and far better predictives. However...Iowa State did just beat Houston, albeit at home. If Wednesday results aren't factored in, UConn likely would still be on the top line. Close call, but at the end of the day we're going with Houston because I believe on a neutral court they're the better team than Iowa State or UConn. For conspiracy theory fans, Houston on the top line Saturday makes a lot of sense because it sets up all four 1-seeds playing each other later that same day (Michigan/Duke at MSG while Arizona is at Houston).

5-Iowa State Cyclones: While Iowa State has a decent 1-seed argument, none of their team sheet metrics are in the top-4 and they lack the Quadrant 1 wins to be higher than this. If the Selection Committee emphasizes the result from Hilton the Cyclones could be higher, but they will certainly be no lower than a 2-seed.

6-Connecticut Huskies: From a resume perspective, especially the important Wins Above Bubble, UConn looks like they should be higher. But the loss to Creighton will likely be factored in based on last year's precedent, and that's a loss neither Houston nor Iowa State have. The Huskies do have the better record and a neutral court head-to-head win over Illinois, which is why they hold on to this spot.

7-Illinois Fighting Illini: Illinois has the predictive metrics to be on the top line but too many losses and not good enough resume metrics to get up there. A win over Michigan next week could get them in consideration, but it's the only real needle moving game left on their schedule before the Big 10 Tournament so this is probably their ceiling.

8-Purdue Boilermakers: Everything about Purdue's resume screams 2-seed. Metrically they are right in line there and they have a great win profile with no bad losses. While this isn't the season the Boilermaker fans were hoping for, having six of the seven metrics between 5-8 should have them safely as a 2-seed.

9-Kansas Jayhawks: The top end wins are good enough for the top line, but loss volume and poor predictives compared to the teams ahead of them keep Kansas here. They still get Houston at home and go to Arizona, so the resume wins to move up are on the schedule, as are some easier opponents to juice the predictive numbers. If Kansas can get their predictives into single digits they could be a 2-seed, or even a 1-seed with some help.

10-Florida Gators: The predictive metrics say they should be higher, but loss volume and relatively poor resume metrics drag them down. Florida's resume is solid but there aren't major needle moving opportunities left for them. This may be their ceiling, but they are likely the most dangerous 3-Seed when the actual bracket comes out.

11-Nebraska Cornhuskers: Fans might think Nebraska is playing poorly after starting 20-0 before losing four of six. However, in that stretch they are still ranked #16 in Torvik and their kenpom ranking has actually improved from #12 when they lost their undefeated record at Michigan until today where they sit at #11. While they may not have the fortune that fueled their great start, this is still a deserving 3-seed. One thing to watch, if they end up on a cut line between the 2/3 or 3/4, their non-conference strength of schedule could drag them lower than expected.

12-Gonzaga Bulldogs: The good news is Gonzaga's twenty-six wins are tied with Miami-Ohio for the most in the country. The bad news is their two losses are a 40-point shellacking at the hands of Michigan and an embarrassing Quadrant 3 loss at Portland, the only such loss among our projected Top-16. It's hard to seed this team as their numbers are more reflective of a 4-seed, but looking at their resume it's hard to put any of the 4-seeds ahead of them.

13-Michigan State Spartans: Sparty is the team I most considered against Gonzaga, but more than double the losses, worse in five of the seven team sheet metrics, and not definitively better in terms of win quality were all reasons I couldn't push them higher. I'm comfortable with them as a 4-seed.

14-Vanderbilt Commodores: They've got a great win profile and metrics comparable to Michigan State. The biggest difference is that while Vandy has a better overall win collection, they don't have any single result that can match Michigan State's win over Illinois. When it's this close, those are the fine lines that separate teams.

15-Virginia Cavaliers: What really jumps out is Virginia's 4-0 record against Quadrant 1A opponents. While their metrics are all right on the edge of the 4/5 lines, they've got enough at the top to justify inclusion tomorrow.

16-Texas Tech Red Raiders: Honestly, if any 4-seed shows up ahead of Gonzaga, this might be the pick. Due to the guidance given to the media committee yesterday, Texas Tech was dropped down because of J.T. Toppin's season-ending injury. While they have the best collection of top-tier wins (Duke, Arizona, Houston) their metrics even with Toppin were more fitting of a 4-seed than a 3-seed and it's hard to not see them falling off without him. They will likely fall from the 3-seed they could have been, the should still keep their place in the Top-16 until we're actually able to see how they do without Toppin. Their next two are home games against Kansas State and Cincinnati so they should get a chance to acclimate to their new lineups before traveling to Ames.

17-Alabama Crimson Tide: If Alabama is in the Top-16, the resume metrics and elite schedule will be the reasons. However they lack the massive quality wins of a Texas Tech and the overall profile of a Michigan State or Vanderbilt. If they are included, I think it might be Virginia that's left out. Another factor that won't be mentioned but might factor in is Charles Bediako. Alabama added three wins over tourney teams with him in the lineup and now that he's been ruled ineligible, the Selection Committee may quietly knock them down a couple spots because of it.

18-Tennessee Volunteers: The predictive average indicates Top-16 and the Volunteers have a win over Houston that's aging very well, but there just isn't enough depth at the top of the resume to match the teams ahead of them. 

19-Arkansas Razorbacks: Arkansas is the team where everything is close but not quite good enough. They don't have a single metric in the top-16. Their six Quadrant 1 wins are good, but they lack the truly elite wins and overall Quadrant 1+2 win volume of teams ahead of them.

Here's the full seed list and bracket:

Multibid Leagues

SEC: 11

Big 10: 10

ACC: 8

Big 12: 8

Big East: 3

WCC: 3

1 in 14,000,605

Dr. Strange: "I went forward in time to view alternate futures, to see all the possible outcomes of the coming conflict."

Peter Quill: "How many did you see?"

Dr. Strange: "Fourteen million six hundred five."

Tony Stark: "How many did we win?"

Dr. Strange: "One."

On today's Scrambled Eggs podcast, host Joe McCann theorized about a possibility of Marquette winning the Big East automatic bid and what it would take for that unlikely outcome to happen. Essentially, if Dr. Strange were forecasting Marquette's future, what possible set of outcomes would end up with a Marquette NCAA Tournament bid? Finding the concept interesting, I took the thought experiment and applied it to the remaining Big East schedule. How could this worst of all possible seasons turn around and end with Marquette in the NCAA Tournament? This, gentle readers, is that one outcome.

First, we need to look at the remaining Big East schedule. Because it doesn't matter for our purposes, we are going to simply assume that UConn will win out, St. John's will only lose to UConn, and the current 3-5 standings will hold as Villanova, Seton Hall, and Creighton beat everyone except UConn and St. John's (those three don't play each other at all). This also assumes every team currently ranked 6-11 in the Big East (Marquette, Georgetown, Xavier, DePaul, Butler, and Providence) will lose every remaining game they play against those top-5 teams. Here is how we need the remaining Big East regular season games for teams 6-11 to play out, with red highlights for losses and green for wins:

This scenario puts Marquette alone in 6th place in the conference, giving us the following current standings:

1. Connecticut

2. St. John's

3. Villanova

4. Seton Hall

5. Creighton

6. Marquette

However, it's obviously a mess when you get to teams 7-11 who are in a five-way tie for last place (or 7th place, if you're an optimist). So how do we sort those teams out? According to the Big East rules, in a multiple team tie with three or more teams, "Teams are viewed as a 'mini-conference' when comparing head-to-head result. The team, or teams with the best winning percentage vs. the other teams in the mini-conference gains the advantage, and the team, or teams, with the worst winning percentage vs. the other teams in the mini-conference are seeded the lowest. Only common opponents will be considered." This means the results of Xavier, DePaul, Georgetown, Butler, and Providence only against each other are compared. Here are those standings:

Go figure, even when they tie for seventh, DePaul still ends up last in the league. Unfortunate for the Blue Demons, but it does provide two more answers for our league standings:

1. Connecticut

2. St. John's

3. Villanova

4. Seton Hall

5. Creighton

6. Marquette

7. Xavier

11. DePaul

Teams 8-10 are yet to be determined. Going back to the league rules, "If three or more (but not all) teams have the same best winning percentage in the original mini-conference, then those tied teams create a new mini-conference and follow this same procedure beginning of Step 1 (Multiple Team Tie)." So now we scale back to a smaller mini-conference with the following standings:

This gives us the following final standings:

1. Connecticut

2. St. John's

3. Villanova

4. Seton Hall

5. Creighton

6. Marquette

7. Xavier

8. Georgetown

9. Butler

10. Providence

11. DePaul

And with that, we have our full Big East conference tournament bracket:

So we've got the bracket we need, what about the results once that bracket comes out? Here's what we need to see:

Wednesday

• Xavier over Providence: Honestly, this one could go either way, but Xavier winning is more poetic.
• Marquette over DePaul: Obviously, Marquette can't win a one in fourteen million shot if they don't win the first game of the tournament.

Quarterfinals

• Connecticut over Georgetown/Butler: I didn't include the Wednesday result here because neither of these teams are beating UConn. Just not happening. Even Dr. Strange can only stretch reality so far.
• Seton Hall over Creighton: They split the season series with the two games separated by 3 points, this should be a good one.
• Xavier over St. John's: The Musketeers led St. John's by double-digits in the second half in Cincinnati and led with a minute to play, then led again with under a minute at MSG before the Johnnies escaped in overtime. This is a game Xavier can win, though honestly, we've already seen Providence win at MSG so either of the 7/10 teams could pull this off.
• Marquette over Villanova: Twice Marquette was down by 3 and had a final possession to force overtime. 'Nova is a team Marquette can beat, just need to trim that 3 point lead to 2 and make the shot on the final possession.

Semifinals

• Seton Hall over Connecticut: Since UConn returned to the Big East in 2021, Dan Hurley has donated one win every season to his alma mater. The Pirates were within one point in the final minute the first time they played, their NCAA hopes will rely on pulling off the upset at MSG, and Hurley hasn't paid his annual debt yet.
• Marquette over Xavier: From a matchup perspective, I don't think Marquette can beat St. John's, but they already beat Xavier once (and Providence, if they end up in this slot) and could do it again.

Final

• Marquette over Seton Hall: I don't think Marquette can beat UConn either, but they had second half leads on Seton Hall both times they played. Finish the second half, cut nets, and go into the NCAA Tournament as a 16-19 team, likely earning a 12-seed. And this is the 1 in 14,000,605 scenario by which Marquette makes the NCAA Tournament. What happens beyond that? We're taking this one miracle at a time.

The one where the boys talk about evolving

Well, well, well. #mubb certainly threw out a bit of a bombshell this weekend(while letting X bomb 3s but pffffsssttt, whatever), in which Shaka and co reveal that the program is evolving. It is very heavily implied that that evolution, the portal is open for business. We spend a bulk of the pod discussing the report, the implications the program, and what impact we think we'll see this off season. As part of that discussion, we talk retention which leads us to discuss the teams performance over the last week. We then remember Chris Farley for happy times and close out with a preview of St Johns. Enjoy!

 

https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/m76z7eai2svhcxya/2026_Feb_15_Portal_Kombata3aa1.mp3

 

Cracketology: 404 Top-16 Reveal Not Found

Historically, the Top-16 Reveal is held on the Saturday after the Super Bowl. As soon as football exits stage left, college basketball takes over and that first weekend is when they announce to the casuals who the top teams are and give everyone a preview of what the NCAA Tournament will look like.

Except...they're not doing that this year. They quietly pushed the Top-16 Reveal to next Saturday, February 21st. That very suddenly made all the writing I did on the teams I would expect to see there if the Reveal were held now moot. And after hours of time wasted on graphics and writing, well, I don't really have the time for a whole new theme.

This week, it will just be a seed list and bracket. Here's how we would project things if today were Selection Sunday:

Multibid Leagues

SEC: 11

Big 10: 10

ACC: 9

Big 12: 7

Big East: 3

WCC: 3

NMD win has us feeling a new feeling, positive trends

 Well, #scrambledeggs took a break but #mubb did not. The team went 2-1 in games during the break and generally looked the best they've looked in 2026. We break down the player performances and game results and what the team seems to be building towards improved play. We then celebrate this week in MU history with a game that uplifted an otherwise sad season (sound familiar?). We then look to the week ahead and whether or not #mubb can continue the positive performances in February. Enjoy!

 

https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/uqhm7bn5ue8jw6qx/2026_Feb_7_NMDap2bj.mp3

 

Cracketology: Big East Win Targets

Kevin Willard has Villanova in good shape for the 2026 NCAA Tournament

Photo by Ella Johnson | The Villanovan

As the calendar turns to February, things look pretty bleak for the Big East. Just three teams are safely in the field at the moment and everyone else seems to be moving away from the bubble rather than towards it. Today we'll take a look at current Wins Above Bubble scores from T-Rank and use that to calculate what the Big East needs from its at-large contenders to get over the hump. Bear in mind that right now, there are 27 teams between +1.0 and -1.0 WAB, so we're looking for Big East teams to get above +1.0 to be considered on the right side of the bubble. So what to Big East teams need to do to secure NCAA bids? Let's look:

UConn Huskies (21-1, +7.7 WAB): 0 wins

Dan Hurley's team could lose all of their remaining games and still safely be in the field, likely as a single-digit seed. They would take some bad losses along the way, so the Selection Committee would certainly knock them down a bit, but they would still have a +2.65 WAB and will be dancing no matter what happens.

St. John's Red Storm (16-5, +2.3 WAB): 4 wins

The Johnnies need to go 4-6 the rest of the way to feel secure. That would give them a +1.75 WAB that should be enough. They are favored in all their remaining games except against UConn. If they want to move their seed up, they really need to pick up at least one of the UConn games. There just isn't much left on the schedule for them to really improve their resume.

Villanova Wildcats (16-5, +2.3 WAB): 5 wins

In his first year at Villanova, Kevin Willard should feel pretty secure of dancing. They don't have a ton of heft at the top of the resume, but they are favorites in 8 of their remaining 10 and 3 of their 5 road games are against teams in the bottom half of the league. A 5-5 record would give them a +1.55 WAB. Like St. John's, there isn't a ton of room to move up, with the late February games against UConn and at St. John's being their only real resume movers.

Shaheen Holloway is hoping to edge the Pirates inside the bubble

Photo by Mason Bashkoff | Seton Hall Athletics

Seton Hall Pirates (16-6, +0.7 WAB): 6 wins

The Pirates are getting back on track after a four-game losing skid, but it doesn't get easier with road games at Villanova, Creighton, and Butler in their next four. The downside for them is they only have 9 games left and are underdogs in 6. What would really help are wins against the three teams above them as they currently only have one projected win over the field (N.C. State). If they don't win at 'Nova on Wednesday, they likely will need to either beat UConn or St. John's in the last week of the season to feel safe. Getting to 6-3 down the stretch would put them at +1.97 WAB and almost certainly secure. 5-4 would have them on the bubble and given the parity on the bubble this year, particularly with their lack of high-end wins, it probably wouldn't be enough.

Butler Bulldogs (13-9, -1.3 WAB): 8 wins

Thad Matta's seat has to be feeling a bit warm. Losing at St. John's is acceptable, but a home loss to Georgetown likely ended their fading bubble hopes. They need to go 8-1 down the stretch to feel at all comfortable, which would give them a +1.66 WAB.

Creighton Blue Jays (12-10, -1.6 WAB): 8 wins

Greg McDermott has seen his team drop 3 of 4 with two of those losses being to bottom feeders Providence and Marquette on the road. They are hanging on by a thread with only 9 games remaining. The Jays are also underdogs in 6 of those with 5 away from home. They need a miracle. 8-1 would qualify as a miracle and put them at +1.66 WAB.

Ed Cooley looks to have thrown away any NCAA hopes

Photo by Ian Bethune | Storrs Central

Georgetown (-2.5 WAB) & Xavier (-2.6 WAB): Win Out

Both of these teams are effectively done and would have to go undefeated the rest of the regular season. For the Hoyas, that would put them at +1.55 WAB while Xavier would get to +1.98 WAB. Put this in the virtually impossible bin, and note these teams do play each other on February 28th so even if both get red hot, they won't both finish in the at-large places.

DePaul (-3.1 WAB), Providence (-4.5 WAB), & Marquette (-6.5 WAB): 4 wins at MSG

DePaul is the only one of these that can get over 0.0 WAB by winning out, but their bad losses and lack of quality wins will have them on the outside looking in. Both Providence and Marquette have already taken on too much water to get above zero, so their only hope is a four-game run in the Big Apple.

Let's look at the current seed list and field:

Multibid Leagues

Big 10: 10

SEC: 9

ACC: 9

Big 12: 7

Big East: 3

A-10: 2

MAC: 2

Mountain West: 2

WCC: 2